Issue #65, Volume #3The Coming T-Bill CollapseBy Martin Fridson • Tuesday 28, April 2026View in browser

Inside today’s Daily Journal…

• Essay: The Coming T-Bill Collapse
• Farm bankruptcies soar
• OpenAI revenue speed bump
• UAE out of OPEC
• Chart Of The Day… Intel
• Poll results… interest rate cuts in 2026
• Today’s Mailbag

U.S. Debt Has Lost Its Elite Investment Status

Editor’s note: Porter has turned the Journal over to Marty Fridson, lead analyst for Porter & Co.’s Distressed Investing. For nine consecutive years, Marty was ranked No. 1 in high-yield strategy… He brings those years of experience to today’s Journal about the weakening market for U.S. Treasuries.

Here’s Marty…

The U.S. government has spent its way into a collapse of the sovereign U.S. Treasury debt regime…

Like it or not, foreign companies and banks need dollars in order to do business. The problem for those foreign-dollar users is that U.S. bank regulations got tighter after the Global Financial Crisis in 2008.

That raised the cost for banks to provide dollar funding to the rest of the world. As a result, the premium paid by foreigners for directly accessing dollars went up. And the premium goes up even more when times get tough, as everybody clambers for dollar funding all at the same time.

So for now, at least, the rest of the world still wants dollars, and the Fed has been creating them with seemingly no limit. As one French finance minister famously put it in 1960: the U.S. currency still enjoys an “exorbitant privilege.” Neither the euro nor the Chinese yuan is on the verge of usurping its place in global trade.

For U.S. Treasury bonds, on the other hand, a grim future has already arrived.

To understand the math behind this grim future, imagine you’re a European investor who wants to earn a return in dollars. Buying a U.S. government bond is the simplest way to do so – but it’s not the only way.

You could instead buy a German government bond and use the foreign-exchange market to convert the euro-denominated interest to dollars. This is called a “synthetic” dollar investment.

Up until 2008, investors were usually willing to opt for accepting a lower yield to own U.S. government debt directly – Treasury bonds were the most liquid form of sovereign debt and everyone accepted them as collateral.

But those advantages disappeared as the total amount of marketable Treasury debt exploded from $6 trillion in 2008 to $30 trillion in 2025. To be clear, it’s no cause for panic when Treasury debt simply grows along with an expanding U.S. economy. But the 2008-2025 increase represented a 10% annual growth rate. Real (inflation-adjusted) GDP grew just 2.25% a year over the same period. In short, the federal government has been stepping up its production of debt much faster than U.S. workers and businesses have been stepping up the production of goods and services.

Investors haven’t missed the fact that the U.S. government has been spending and borrowing with reckless abandon. So instead of accepting a lower yield on Treasury bonds than on the synthetic variety described above, they’re now demanding a premium yield to lend to the U.S. government.

Up until 2023, Treasury bills, which are issued with maturities of one year or less, still enjoyed their special privilege, yielding less than comparable foreign obligations. No longer, thanks to the Treasury flooding the market with this near-cash type of paper. Between 2013 and 2019, the amount of Treasury bills outstanding expanded by 52%. In the next six years the amount ballooned 171%.

There’s no mystery about the Treasury’s increasing reliance on these very short-term obligations. At most times, T-bills represent cheaper funding than bonds, which have maturities of up to 30 years. At certain times during the last 20 years, the gap has been as great as two percentage points. That means the government can save taxpayers billions of dollars by issuing shorter-dated debt.

But there’s a risk attached to that strategy. The Treasury could wind up having to replace a large portion of its debt at a difficult time in the market, when borrowing costs are higher. This risk explains why responsible corporate treasurers never let too much of their companies’ debt come due within the next 12 months.

Given these disturbing facts, it’s not surprising that America’s debt has lost its elite investment status. And let’s not be complacent about the foreigners’ longstanding love affair with the dollar. There have already been some rumblings of discontent.

During 2009, the dollar’s price dropped sharply against gold and some major world currencies. In one of the most noteworthy reactions, supermodel Gisele Bündchen demanded that consumer-good giant Procter & Gamble pay her in euros for her efforts to promote its line of Pantene hair products.

If the dollar falls off its pedestal sooner rather than later, don’t say you haven’t been warned.

Tell us what you think of today’s Journal: porterstansberrydirect@gmail.com

Martin Fridson
New York, New York

Porter called “BULL***T” until he saw it in action

Click here for the full story

3 Things To Know Before We Go…

1. Farm bankruptcies up 46% as fertilizer costs double. Rising urea fertilizer prices – climbing from $355 to $720 per metric ton – catalyzed a 46% surge in U.S. farm bankruptcies in 2025. With the U.S. Department of Agriculture projecting total farm debt to hit a record $624.7 billion in 2026, the closure of the Strait of Hormuz is pushing producers into a yield-loss corner. To survive, farmers – also greatly harmed by the imposition of tariffs – must now cut the use of fertilizer, pivot acreage from corn to less nitrogen-intensive soybeans, or simply accept lower harvests… leading toward sustained food inflation.

2. More trouble at OpenAI. The company behind ChatGPT has missed several monthly revenue targets this year and has also fallen short of its 2025 goal of reaching 1 billion weekly active users. OpenAI CFO Sarah Friar has reportedly said she is concerned about OpenAI’s ability to fund its future computing contracts, which now total more than $1.2 trillion. The ripple effects of financial distress at OpenAI – currently being sued by Elon Musk over its non-profit status – could spread far and wide, as many of America’s largest technology firms are investing heavily in computing capacity based on the promise of OpenAI’s future spending commitments.

3. The United Arab Emirates is leaving OPEC. This morning, the UAE announced it will exit the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (“OPEC”) – ending nearly six decades of membership and stripping OPEC of its third-largest producer. The country has been pumping roughly 30% below its 4.85 million barrels per day (“bpd”) capacity to comply with OPEC quotas – representing roughly 1.5 million bpd of additional crude oil it will now be able to deploy freely. Once Gulf shipping normalizes, this additional supply is likely to put downward pressure on the price of oil.

Chart Of The Day… A Long-Awaited Record For Intel

Shares of semiconductor firm Intel (INTC) soared 23% to an all-time high following blowout earnings on surging AI-related central processing unit (“CPU”) demand, officially surpassing its dot-com bubble peak for the first time after nearly 26 years.

Poll Results… Interest Rate Cuts In 2026

On Friday, with the news that it now seems likely that the U.S. Senate had cleared the path for the confirmation of Kevin Warsh as new chair of the Federal Reserve, we asked Journal readers:

Will the Fed cut interest rates at all during the remainder of 2026?… 57% of survey takers selected “no,” while 43% said “yes.”

Mailbag

In yesterday’s Daily Journal, “Warren’s Mistakes,” Porter explained what’s gone wrong with Berkshire Hathaway and how investors can build a portfolio that can do much better. Readers share their thoughts…

“What’s Gone Wrong At Berkshire Hathaway”

K Miller. writes:

Excellent, if you do not legally maintain your advantage, others may beat you badly.

“GEICO And Progressive”

Rob M. writes:

Dear Porter,

You took a subject that I normally could not possibly care about, and turned it into a fascinating essay. I am absolutely stunned at the amount of data that you revealed about the weakness of Berkshire Hathaway as related to the insurance segment of its investments – you explained it beautifully.

“The Most Dangerous Lie: Shannon’s Essay”

Jim F. writes:

Hi Porter,

Completely agree on the negative aspects of the “modern family” with both husband and wife in the workforce. Interesting take on specialization and what you pointed out is quite true. Thanks for your article. But you missed the root cause.

The root cause of females in the workforce is our dishonest monetary system and the goals of those who run it. The folks who create money from nothing and charge us interest on it completely control governments and education. Governments impose confiscatory taxation schemes and destroy the value of currencies through dilution. Our educational system dumbs down children to such an extent that they are unable and unwilling to think for themselves. Females are taught men are bad/stupid/useless and that to enter the workforce and earn currency is their natural role, that it represents “emancipation,” and is much superior to raising their own children and keeping their own household.

It’s two factors: economic necessity (confiscatory taxation in combination with a continual loss of purchasing power), and education (teaching lies, nonsense, and how never to think for yourself, but instead, to defer to authorities/leaders/experts).

Our overlords are not stupid – getting females in the workforce doubled the tax base and insures the state raises your children. Your article about specialization is only describing the failings (or great success) of modern education – young people don’t think for themselves, can’t do simple math, and believe in the lies taught in our schools.

Please note: The investments in our “Porter & Co. Top Positions” should not be considered current recommendations. These positions are the best performers across our publications – and the securities listed may (or may not) be above the current buy-up-to price. To learn more, visit the current recommendations page of the relevant service, here. To gain access or to learn more about our current recommendations, call our Customer Care team at 888-610-8895 or internationally at +1 443-815-4447.

www.PorterandCompany.com |  support@porterandcompanyresearch.com | 888-610-8895

You have received this e-mail as part of your subscription with Porter & Company, LLC. If you no longer want to receive e-mails, unsubscribe here.

Porter & Company, LLC welcomes comments or suggestions at support@porterandcompanyresearch.com. For questions about your account or to speak with customer service, call 888-610-8895 Monday-Friday, 9 a.m.-5 p.m. Eastern time. 

Please note: The law prohibits us from giving personalized financial advice.

© 2026 Porter & Company, LLC,. All rights reserved. Any reproduction, copying, or redistribution, in whole or in part, is prohibited without written permission from Porter & Company, LLC.

Disclaimer: Nothing in this email should be considered personalized financial advice. Do not consider any communication between you and Porter & Company, and its employees or writers as financial advice. This work is based on SEC filings, current events, interviews, corporate press releases, and what we’ve learned as financial journalists. It may contain errors, and you shouldn’t make any investment decision based solely on what you read here. Insight is provided to help readers gain knowledge and experience. All investments carry risk. Readers should not trade if they cannot handle a loss and should not trade more than they can afford to lose. Consider consulting with a professional before making investment decisions. Please be aware that by accessing this publication, you acknowledge and agree that Porter & Co. and its editors and affiliates may, at any time, buy or sell securities discussed in this publication without prior notice. This may result in potential conflicts of interest, as Porter & Co., its editors, and affiliates may have a financial interest in the securities mentioned. The views expressed in this publication are subject to change without notice and reflect the personal opinions of the authors and speakers.

By submitting a response or feedback, you hereby grant Porter & Co. the right to use, reproduce, and publish your feedback in any and all marketing materials, including but not limited to online platforms, print advertisements, and promotional content. Your review may be edited for clarity and length, but the substance of your feedback will remain unchanged. Please note that your personal information will be kept confidential and will not be disclosed without your explicit consent. If you have any questions or concerns regarding this agreement, please contact us at support@porterandcompanyresearch.com or to speak with customer service, call 888-610-8895 Monday-Friday, 9 a.m.-5 p.m. Eastern time.