RJ Hamster
Cabo San Lucas Homes For Sale
448 Cabo San Lucas Homes For Sale
— Read on www.owninloscabosrealestate.com/search/results/landing/Cabo-San-Lucas-Homes-For-Sale/
RJ Hamster
RJ Hamster
RJ Hamster
End of America update
There are five things they will never tell you.
Five things every American must know. Five things that could either massively enrich you or completely destroy you depending on the moves you make today.
If you’re honest with yourself, none of these things should surprise you… you already know about them. Deep down you can feel them. Even when you try to ignore them.
And you already know these problems aren’t going away. They won’t magically fix themselves. Nobody is coming to your rescue. You need to take action into your own hands.
Read the list below and tell me where I’m wrong…
#1. The government is bankrupt.
It’s lying about inflation because every percentage point higher in CPI automatically raises Social Security’s liabilities. Those liabilities now exceed $100 trillion.
They can’t be financed. Not without destroying the dollar.
Think Rome, when it could no longer afford free grain for its citizens. Think Europe after World War I, when nations tried to print their way out of impossible debts.
The real-world rate of inflation is not 3% or 4%.
I’d bet it’s closer to 12%+ in America’s major cities and growing.
Every dollar you earn buys less each month… and that decline is accelerating.
#2. Your savings are being vaporized.
Virtually all your dollar-based assets — cash in the bank, 401(k), wages — will lose half their value in the next four years.
Grocery prices, housing, healthcare, insurance… you’ve seen what’s happened since 2009. Now imagine it all doubling again by 2029. That’s the future we’re heading toward if you stand still.
#3. AI will save the private sector but not you.
Artificial intelligence will help companies survive inflation.
But it will do it by displacing millions of people.Private sector employment will shrink by double digits every year for at least the next decade. Law, accounting, finance, even medicine—white-collar work is being displaced at a speed no one is prepared for.
And those in government jobs or fixed pensions?
They’ll be wiped out entirely as deficits and inflation devour their real income.
#4. The violence hasn’t even begun.
Since 2009, we’ve seen the opening act—crime, riots, political rage.
But as the dollar collapses, a civil fracture is inevitable. Those closest to the flow of new money (what economists call the Cantillon Effect) will grow richer. Everyone else will struggle to survive.
It’s the same pattern that’s ended every empire in history.
#5. These “problems” represent an unprecedented transfer of wealth.
For people who understand the economics behind this societal and financial collapse, this crisis represents a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to amass multi-generational wealth.
I’m not describing a theory. I’m not describing an idea. Or a forecast. I’m not talking about something that might happen, some day. I’m talking about what’s happening right now.
This has been happening since the bailouts began in 2009.
I’ve been writing about these issues, virtually every day, since.
When I first warned about these problems America still had a AAA credit rating. Occupy Wall Street hadn’t happened yet. Nor BLM. Or Covid lockdowns. Or our government forcing us to take vaccines.
I gave anyone who was worried the complete blueprint to save themselves: gold, great businesses, Bitcoin… and avoid the dollar at all costs.
But now, with the advent of a new technological force, there is one final step we urge you to take to ensure your wealth is not only safeguarded but continues to compound going forward.
And you must take it now.
Because the forces at work here are moving at breakneck pace.
If you bury your head in the sand, you could be left behind as one of the greatest transfers of wealth ever unfolds. Don’t let that happen to you. I share everything you need to know here:
➡ Watch my urgent new exposé, The Final Displacement, free of charge.
Good investing,
Porter Stansberry
RJ Hamster
While Other Investors Chase Hype, Do This Instead
Eric Fry
Editor, Smart Money
DAILY ISSUE
While Other Investors Chase Hype, Do This Instead
Hello, Reader.
Imagine you have a tiny pebble in your hand. You stand on the shore of some calm water. Then, you toss your pebble in, breaking the serene surface.
The disturbed water ripples out, creating expanding rings, but becomes still after a short time.
Now, imagine you hold a boulder. You drop it in the water. Splash! Waves slosh out in all directions. It’s a much messier affair.
The Magnificent Seven stocks are a lot like that overweight boulder.
In 2015, Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL), Amazon.com Inc. (AMZN), Apple Inc. (AAPL), Meta Platforms Inc. (META), Microsoft Corp. ( MSFT), Nvidia Corp. (NVDA), and Tesla Inc. ( TSLA) made up around 12% of the S&P 500.
Today, they make up roughly 35%. Each one a heavy boulder.
A large portion of their market dominance is due to artificial intelligence.
This kind of immense growth may make these companies appear rewarding and unstoppable, especially as several of them reported better-than-expected earnings this week.
However, for a boulder-sized company, minor disappointments, missteps, or even perceived fears can trigger outsized reactions in an overconcentrated market.
In fact, today’s AI boom is checking important boxes that indicated a bubble back in 1999… which is why I want investors to proceed with caution, especially as glittering headlines could make the Mag 7 seem appealing right now.
Even a pretty boulder is still a boulder.
So, in today’s Smart Money, I’ll explain why you’ll want to avoid the dangerous weight of the Mag 7 companies, despite their “magnificent” earnings…
Then, I’ll show you calmer waters to invest in instead.
Let’s jump in…
Recommended Link
When the AI Crash Comes, These Six Stocks Could be the Biggest Winners
When bubbles pop, money rotates to quality. Eric Fry found businesses with proven models AI can’t touch: a drive-through beverage chain with a cult following, an outdoor brand so beloved that customers tattoo its logo on their bodies, and more. These “AI Survivors” are the stocks you want to own before the bubble pops. Details here.
The Warning Signs Are Flashing
Meta, Microsoft, and Tesla reported earnings on Wednesday afternoon, all beating earnings-per-share and revenue estimates. Apple followed on Thursday, also delivering better-than-expected results.
Almost every share price surged in response… except Microsoft’s, which dropped roughly 10% in after-hours trading.
There were signs of a slight slowdown in Microsoft’s cloud growth. The company’s Azure and cloud services revenue slowed slightly, growing 39% compared to last quarter’s 40%.
Notably, investors were nervous about AI-related spending. Microsoft’s quarterly capital expenditures and finance leases reached $37.5 billion – up 66% from last year and above Wall Street’s $34.3 billion prediction.
As shares of MSFT slid, it brought the S&P 500 and Nasdaq Composite down with it, the two major indices ending Thursday down 0.13% and 0.72%, respectively.
In short, as the Mag 7 enter their middling years, the broader indices will feel the weight.
Generally speaking, proactive preparation works better than reactive repairing. The best time to reinforce your house is not when the hurricane is already tearing off the roof, but while the sun is still shining.
I expect any future AI bust — whenever it arrives — to rhyme with the dot-com bust. Here are two main reasons why…
- Extreme concentration. The top 10 stocks represent 40% of the market (vs. 23% in 2000). That means that a stumble by just one or two of those stocks can be an anchor that drags down all stocks.
Microsoft’s decline this week is a smaller-scale example. We saw a larger-scale version back in December, when the major indexes experienced four straight days of losses, driven by selloffs in prominent AI companies. - Circular financing. In the dot-com era, companies and others began lending money to their own customers, creating circular deals and artificial revenue.
Similarly, OpenAI is buying billions of dollars in Nvidia processors… while Nvidia is investing $100 billion in OpenAI.
These characteristics should ring alarm bells, as they highlight unsustainable practices that put stocks at risk, particularly during earnings season.
What the Dot-Com Bust Taught Me
I return to the dot-com era because the strategy I used then may be just as useful now.
Back then, it became clear that betting heavily on market leaders was driven by hype. So, I shifted toward dependable, non-internet stocks. The pebbles.
The same principle applies today: You don’t have to buy overpriced, speculative AI boulders just because they dominate headlines.
In the late ’90s, you could have said “no” to frothy dot-com stocks and instead invested in stocks like American Eagle Outfitters Inc. (AEO), Best Buy Co. Inc. (BBY), homebuilder NVR Inc. (NVR ), or energy company Frontier Oil.
None promised to revolutionize the world… nor did they have a game-changing internet strategy. But all raked in huge gains as the internet boom burst.
They provided quality goods and services at the exact moment when investors picked reality over hype.
From 1996 to 2005 – while the S&P 500 returned less than 8% a year – Frontier Oil rose more than 3,500%… Best Buy gained over 4,000%… NVR climbed nearly 5,000%… and American Eagle gained nearly 8,000%.
Similar opportunities exist today. I call them “AI Survivor” companies – businesses that don’t depend on AI hype to succeed but are positioned to endure this unpredictable landscape.
At Fry’s Investment Report, our portfolio includes non-AI companies that I believe offer stability and upside in an increasingly overconcentrated market… where a single misstep by a big name can ripple through everything.
Click here to learn more about safeguarding your portfolio.
Regards,
Eric Fry
Editor, Smart Money
P.S. AI Survivors are one of the tools that can help protect your portfolio during periods of market turbulence – which is exactly the kind of market my colleague Luke Lango believes is taking shape this year. While the AI boom continues to fuel markets, the approach to investing in it has evolved.
In his new Genesis Mission broadcast, Luke explains how Washington is actively funding, fast-tracking, and steering the buildout needed to win the AI race… and how investors can join in. Click here for all the details.
RJ Hamster
My Dividend Portfolio. Goal: $12K in 120 Months —…
My coffee is paid for. Forever.
— Read on www.maxdividends.com/p/my-dividend-portfolio-goal-12k-in-a92
RJ Hamster
Matthew 25:34-40 – Practicing God’s Mercy: Showing Kindness and…
Having trouble reading this email? View it in your browser.
Matthew 25:34-40
(34) Then shall the King say unto them on his right hand, Come, ye blessed of my Father, inherit the kingdom prepared for you from the foundation of the world: (35) For I was an hungred, and ye gave me meat: I was thirsty, and ye gave me drink: I was a stranger, and ye took me in: (36) Naked, and ye clothed me: I was sick, and ye visited me: I was in prison, and ye came unto me. (37) Then shall the righteous answer him, saying, Lord, when saw we thee an hungred, and fed thee? or thirsty, and gave thee drink? (38) When saw we thee a stranger, and took thee in? or naked, and clothed thee? (39) Or when saw we thee sick, or in prison, and came unto thee? (40) And the King shall answer and say unto them, Verily I say unto you, Inasmuch as ye have done it unto one of the least of these my brethren, ye have done it unto me.
King James Version Change email Bible version
When we show pity, compassion, and kindness to those in difficult straits, we are practicing the merciful attitude that God expects each of His children to exhibit at all times. Of course, He does not want us to be so soft-hearted that we become an easy mark for those who would take advantage of us, but He does want us to develop a keen sense of discernment that realizes when mercy is a better option than the strict application of rules.
Undoubtedly, each of us would lend a helping hand to another who was in physical need, but there are other situations in which a physical need is not apparent that also require us to extend mercy. Particularly, we need to learn to employ mercy in our dealings with each other on a daily basis. To put it into today’s language, everyone has bad-hair days, and on some days, even a normally lovable person can be very difficult to live with.
Age differences lend themselves to misunderstandings. We may still carry prejudices that rear their ugly heads from time to time, causing friction. Oftentimes, we just do not think before we speak. Mistakes made in the past can seem to hang over us like a cloud and never go away, and thus we do not feel forgiven, affecting our attitudes. And of course, we all have different backgrounds and came from situations in which we perhaps lived our lives in certain shameful ways. Each of these problems can ignite trouble with our closest family members and friends.
The problem that all of us face in making righteous judgments is that we cannot see into the other person’s heart; we do not really know their intentions and attitudes. We have a hard enough time understanding ourselves, let alone someone else! In Jesus’ comments about judgment in His Sermon on the Mount, He cautions us about being too critical: “And why do you look at the speck in your brother’s eye, but do not consider the plank in your own eye?” (Matthew 7:3). Therefore, if we have to make a judgment call, it is far better to lean toward patience, forbearance, and mercy.
So, when we find ourselves offended by anyone, rather than responding in kind, we should apply the principle of giving a soft answer (Proverbs 15:1), turning the other cheek (Matthew 5:39), and extending tender mercies (Colossians 3:12).
Satan would like us to hang on to evil thoughts about another, to hold a grudge against a brother, or to arrive at church with a resentful attitude toward a fellow Christian, but Jesus Christ wants us to remember Matthew 18:35: “So My heavenly Father will [pass judgment against] you if each of you, from his heart, does not forgive his brother his trespasses.” Just as He forgave each of us from the heart, He wants us to learn to forgive others in the same generous, merciful way.
In my forty-plus years in the church, I have made almost all of the mistakes a person can make with his mouth, and realizing this, I have truly appreciated those who have extended mercy and forgiveness to me. They have taught me a great lesson by their spiritual maturity: that I, too, had better extend mercy and kindness to others.
What does God require of us? He tells us plainly in Micah 6:8: “He has shown you, O man, what is good; and what does the LORD require of you, but to do justly, to lovemercy, and to walk humbly with your God?”
— John O. Reid
To learn more, see:
Mercy: The Better Option
Topics:
Speck in Brother’s Eye and Plank in Your Eye
Commentary copyright © 1992-2026 Church of the Great God
Subscription Information
This daily newsletter was sent to you at peterhovis@me.com because you subscribed at www.theberean.org on Apr 14, 2017.
Email Preferences | Unsubscribe
Church of the Great God
P.O. Box 471846
Charlotte, NC 28247
803-802-7075
RJ Hamster
The BBC Says It Didn’t Mislead Viewers. The Evidence…
Forwarded this email? Subscribe here for more
The BBC Says It Didn’t Mislead Viewers. The Evidence Says Otherwise
JAN 31READ IN APP
Following numerous complaints about BBC Look North’s report on the Holderness Hunt, broadcast on 5 January 2026, the BBC has issued a standard response to complainants stating that it believes the programme met editorial standards and did not materially mislead viewers.
The reply we got from the BBC.
While we acknowledge the BBC’s reply, we believe it does not adequately address the core issue raised, namely, the accuracy of a specific factual statement presented to viewers, and that this warrants escalation.
This is not about opinion, balance, or political framing. It is about whether a factual claim was accurately expressed.
What the BBC’s Response Says, and What It Does Not Resolve
In thier reply, the BBC argues that the statement:
“These Old English foxhounds have never been fox hunting; it became illegal long before they were born”
is “strictly accurate” on the basis that fox hunting has been illegal since the Hunting Act 2004, and that the hounds shown were born after that legislation came into force.
However, the wording used in the broadcast reasonably implies that these foxhounds have never hunted, chased, or killed foxes at all. That implication is disputed by documented evidence. For viewers, that distinction is significant. An unqualified statement of this kind can reasonably be understood as a claim about what has happened in practice, rather than a statement limited to what is lawful. Where evidence and legal proceedings exist, greater care is required to ensure that factual wording does not risk misleading audiences.
Legality Is Not the Same as Reality
The BBC’s reasoning effectively rests on the assumption that because fox hunting is illegal, it does not occur. That assumption is problematic.
Illegal acts, by definition, still happen. The existence of legislation does not mean the behaviour it prohibits has ceased; it means it is subject to enforcement and, where appropriate, prosecution.
In this case, there is documented evidence that:
- A former huntsman associated with the Holderness Hunt, Tom Wright, has been charged on two occasions under the Hunting Act 2004
- Footage exists showing Holderness Hunt hounds chasing and killing foxes
- Court proceedings relating to alleged illegal hunting are ongoing
These facts do not require a finding of guilt to be relevant. Their existence alone directly challenges the unqualified assertion that the hounds have “never been fox hunting”.
Holderness Hunt hounds kill a fox in 2023.
Why Context Does Not Resolve the Issue
The BBC’s reply also relies on the argument that, “taken as a whole,” the programme explored allegations of illegal hunting and therefore did not materially mislead viewers.
However, established regulatory principles make clear that due accuracy applies to individual factual statements, not just to a programme’s overall balance or discussion. The inclusion of debate or opposing views elsewhere in a report does not automatically correct or neutralise a misleading factual assertion presented as settled fact.
In this case, the contested statement was delivered at the outset of the item and framed as an uncontested truth. That framing carries particular weight and is unlikely to be reinterpreted by viewers as a purely legal or hypothetical claim.
What Would Have Been Accurate
The BBC could have avoided this issue by using more precise wording, for example, by stating that:
- The Holderness Hunt has not been convicted of fox hunting
- Fox hunting is illegal
- Allegations of illegal hunting exist and are subject to ongoing court proceedings
Such wording would have accurately reflected the legal position without implying that fox hunting has never occurred.
Why Escalation Is Appropriate
The BBC’s reply does not fully address whether the original wording was capable of misleading viewers, focusing instead on broader programme context. As a result, it does not resolve the central concern raised by complainants: that a specific, unqualified factual statement was presented in a way that does not reflect the evidential reality.
For these reasons, the claim of “strict accuracy” is unconvincing, and the response falls short of addressing the underlying issue of due accuracy. That is precisely the type of dispute the Executive Complaints Unit exists to review.
What We Are Asking People to Do
If you received the same response from the BBC and remain concerned about the accuracy of the wording used, you can request a review emailing back another complaint in reference to your previous complaint (1a), outlining how you feel the points you raised in your 1a complaint haven’t been addressed.
You are entitled to explain, calmly and factually, why you believe:
- The wording was unqualified and absolute
- The distinction between legality and reality was not made clear
- The issue has not been fully addressed in the initial response
The BBC is required to log all complaints. Volume matters not because it applies pressure, but because it demonstrates that the issue is genuinely unresolved for a significant number of viewers.
Escalation is not confrontation, it is accountability through due process.
How to Escalate Your BBC Complaint
If you received the BBC’s standard or “blanket” response to your complaint about BBC Look North, you are entitled to escalate the issue.
How to escalate
Use the BBC Complaints website
You can return to the BBC Complaints page and submit a follow-up complaint referencing your previous complaint, explaining, as the BBC asks, why you feel the points raised in your 1a complaint haven’t been addressed.
In both cases, be sure to include your original reference number.
Suggested Email Template
You can use the following wording:
Dear BBC Complaints Team,
Thank you for your response.
I would like to escalate this matter as i believe my initial complaint has not been addressed. This request is in reference to my previous complaint (reference number: [insert your reference number here]).
Dear BBC Complaints Unit,
I am writing to formally request a review of the BBC’s response to my complaint regarding BBC Look North (East Yorkshire and Lincolnshire), broadcast on 5 January 2026.
My original complaint concerned a specific statement made in the report on the Holderness Hunt, in which the presenter stated:
“These Old English foxhounds have never been fox hunting, it became illegal long before they were born.”
The BBC’s response asserts that this statement is “strictly accurate” on the basis that fox hunting is illegal and that the hounds have therefore not been legallyused for fox hunting. However, this was not the wording used in the broadcast.
The statement was presented as an absolute factual claim, that the hounds have never been fox hunting, with no legal qualifier. A reasonable viewer would understand “never” to mean that the hounds have not chased or hunted foxes at all, not merely that they have not been used lawfully.
This distinction is crucial. Illegal acts can and do occur. The existence of the Hunting Act 2004 does not mean fox hunting does not happen, and it does not make the statement accurate.
There is documented evidence that Holderness Hunt hounds have repeatedly chased and killed foxes in recent years, and that former huntsman Tom Wright has been charged twice under section 1 of the Hunting Act 2004 in relation to these hounds, with the court cases on going and to play out this year. Those facts directly contradict the claim that the hounds have “never been fox hunting”.
While the programme may have discussed allegations elsewhere in the item, this does not correct or neutralise a specific factual statement presented as undisputed truth at the outset of the report. Ofcom guidance is clear that inaccuracies are not remedied simply by broader contextual discussion.
I therefore believe the wording breached the BBC’s Editorial Guidelines on Accuracy, in particular the requirement not to materially mislead audiences and to take due care over factual statements.
I am requesting that the ECU review whether the broadcast wording was misleading, and whether a correction or clarification is required to accurately reflect the reality that these hounds have been implicated in alleged illegal fox hunting, including ongoing court proceedings.
Thank you for your consideration.
Kind regards,
We’re blown away by your support this month!
Since launching our appeal to find new monthly donors to join Protect the Wild we can reveal that we have had over 500 new sign ups this month alone! I cannot be more thankful for your incredible support!
Protect the Wild is now backed by over 7,000 people giving a regular monthly donation. That support is what allows us to run undercover investigations, produce hard-hitting media, and keep applying pressure where others hesitate or stay silent.
If you’d like to join us in this record breaking month you can do so by clicking here.
RJ Hamster
13 eye-popping player projections for 2026
Saturday, January 31
TOP NEWS
13 stars with eye-popping stat projections for 2026
Looking at projections for 2026, you don’t need us to tell you Aaron Judge and Shohei Ohtani are primed for monster seasons as usual. But there are some other players predicted for big things ahead, and some might surprise you.
As clock ticks down to Spring Training, who could still sign Framber?
A’s extend star shortstop Jacob Wilson to 7-year deal
Pasquantino agrees to 2-year contract to avoid arb with Royals
What to expect from Jarren Duran in 2026
Judge (elbow) on schedule; what about rest of rehabbing Yanks?
Pitching help? Another 1st baseman? D-backs expect to make more moves
The top 10 center fielders in baseball are …
Evans (UCL surgery) out for 2026 as Mariners’ pitching depth takes hit
Robertson, star reliever with a big heart, retires after 17 seasons
PLAY A SPORCLE BASEBALL QUIZ!
STAFF PICKS
Team DR shaping up to be a powerhouse
The big names just keep rolling onto the Dominican Republic’s roster for the 2026 World Baseball Classic, with Julio Rodríguez among those who have joined the likes of Fernando Tatis Jr. and Vladimir Guerrero Jr. in committing to play.
Two All-Stars among those joining Mexico for Classic
Jonathan Aranda, Taijuan Walker, Alek Thomas and Joey Ortiz will try to help Team Mexico build upon its third-place finish from 2023, the club’s best in the tournament’s history.
Comparing Spencer Jones to Aaron Judge — as prospects
In the latest MLB Pipeline inbox, Jonathan Mayo weighs a current Yankees prospect against their current three-time MVP, among other questions.
That’s a lot of candles above replacement
If there was a hall of fame for birthdays, today would get in on the first ballot.
Statcast: Best of the Season
MLB Network’s Countdown looks back at some of the hardest hits, fastest pitches and quickest sprints along with other interesting stats and data from the 2025 season at 8 p.m. ET.
© 2026 MLB Advanced Media, L.P. MLB trademarks and copyrights are used with permission of Major League Baseball. Visit MLB.com. Any other marks used herein are trademarks of their respective owners.
Please review our Privacy Policy.
You (peterhovis@icloud.com) received this message because you registered to receive commercial email messages from MLB.com.
Please add info@marketing.mlbemail.com to your address book to ensure our messages reach your inbox. If you no longer wish to receive commercial email messages from MLB.com, please unsubscribe or log in and manage your email subscriptions.
Postal Address: MLB.com, c/o MLB Advanced Media, L.P., 1271 Avenue of the Americas, New York, NY 10020.
RJ Hamster
Gabriel & Co. | Luxury Bridal & Fashion Jewelry…
Discover luxury bridal & fashion jewelry by Gabriel & Co. Custom designs, ethically sourced diamonds & expert craftsmanship since 1989.
— Read on www.gabrielny.com/
RJ Hamster
Shop RV Parts, Outdoor Essentials & Camping Equipment
Find everything for your outdoor adventures at Camping World, from RV trailer parts and towing, to appliances, furniture, and camping equipment. Shop now.
— Read on www.campingworld.com/shop
RJ Hamster