UnsubscribeThe one thing behind SpaceX IPO nobody is pricing in (From The Oxford Club)

Robinhood, SoFi, and Webull Are Telling Very Different Stories

Written by Peter Frank

The retail investing boom delivered platforms that promised to democratize finance. The democratization happened, but investors are now voting no.

SoFi Technologies (NASDAQ: SOFI), Robinhood (NASDAQ: HOOD), and Webull (NASDAQ: BULL) are three of the most prominent names in digital-first platforms for investors who prefer apps over branches. Yet even with some strong recent earnings and diversification, falling share prices, high expectations, regulatory risks, and economic uncertainty are clouding their outlooks.

This earnings season has shown how their stories diverge. One is maturing into a real earner. One is reinventing itself as a full-service bank. And one will soon give an update. Understanding the differences among them is key to knowing whether any of them belongs in a portfolio.

SoFi: Outgrowing Its Origins

SoFi’s first-quarter results represent the strongest fundamental case of the three. Revenue for this year’s first three months came in at a record $1.09 billion, up 41% year-over-year. That represented a 31% EBITDA margin, meaning considerable operating leverage from its ongoing shift toward a diversified digital bank. Net income reached $167 million, or 12 cents a share, for the quarter, an impressive achievement for a company that just two years ago began its public life mostly as a student loan refinancer.

The transformation of SoFi is notable. Moving beyond a single loan category or revenue stream, it now operates across personal lending, home loans, a digital checking and savings platform, a credit card, an investing product, and a technology business that serves other financial institutions. Each of those segments cross-sells into the others. One member who comes for a savings account now has an option for a personal loan, a home loan, or an investment account. They can also refer a friend to capture an array of bonuses. That’s a real stickiness that can lead to premium value.

Like others in this slice of the financial sector, however, the stock tells a more ambivalent story. Despite its strong financials, SoFi shares are down roughly 40% so far this year, an unsettling drop for a company reporting record quarterly results. The explanation is partly the market, as rising deposit costs squeezed net interest margins to 5.94% from 6.01% a year earlier, and competition in personal loans and digital banking has intensified.

Analysts are cautious, with a majority leaning towards a rating of Hold. Of 21 analysts, 11 suggest Hold while seven rate the stock a Buy and three recommend Sell. The average 12-month price target is $22.56, suggesting a nearly 50% upside from current levels.

Robinhood: Rising Expectations, Less Confidence

Robinhood’s first quarter of 2026 told two stories. The headline numbers were solid. Total net revenue came in at $1.07 billion, up 15% from a year earlier, while its net income of $346 million and diluted earnings per share of 38 cents were up just 3%.

The results showed that its streak of profitable quarters continued, and members were signing up. Robinhood Gold subscribers, who pay for the privilege, jumped 36% year over year (YOY) to 4.3 million, suggesting that users are not just trading but committing to the platform. 

Net deposits of $18 billion for the quarter represented a 22% annualized growth rate. Clearly, the company is still appealing to some serious money. Like SoFi, though, the market is unforgiving for high-profile growth stocks. 

Although up, Robinhood’s revenue fell short of Wall Street’s consensus estimate of $1.14 billion. 

Its earnings per share also missed forecasts, and the stock sold off.

The 15% slide just added to the pain during this up-and-down year. Year-to-date, Robinhood is down roughly one-third, sitting at just half the value it reached seven months ago. For investors who got in two years ago, the much-improved underlying business has paid off. But expectations are everything, and Robinhood has set itself up for disappointment.

The structural risk for Robinhood is its continued dependence on trading volumes. And it has been chasing the market, from equities, to options, to crypto, and to event contracts, meaning the prediction markets.

When markets are active and retail investors are engaged, Robinhood generates strong revenue. But when activity cools, so do results. Transaction-based revenue at the company was up 7% in the first quarter from a year earlier to $623 million, but down 20% from last year’s final three months.

Still, analysts remain mildly optimistic. Of the 25 analysts covering the stock, 18 are rating the stock a Buy, while five say Hold and two suggest Sell. The overall rating is a Moderate Buy, with a $107.88 price target within the next 12 months.

Webull: Much the Same But Different

Webull remains the most speculative play in this slice of the retail trading market. Investors are waiting for proof that its growth can translate into sustainable profits.

Founded in Asia by a former Alibaba (NYSE: BABA) executive, the U.S.-based company is pushing heavily into the domestic market with higher marketing spend and increased focus. And on the surface, it’s growing rapidly.

Webull’s earnings last year highlighted a sharp step-up in scale, with full-year revenue reaching $571 million, up 46% from 2024. Like its competitors, results were driven primarily by higher trading-related revenue, which itself grew about 59% YOY.

Customer assets ended the year at $24.6 billion, an 81% increase, supported by $8.6 billion of net deposits, up 91% versus the prior year. Adjusted net income rose roughly tenfold to $84 million, and the company swung from a $22.7 million net loss the previous year to $24.8 million of positive income in 2025, its first year as a public company.

That growth, however, came with a cost, especially in the fourth quarter. Total revenue in those three months grew about 50% YOY to $165.2 million, above analysts’ expectations. Adjusted operating profit per share came in at 4 cents, slightly below the expected level. At the same time, the company’s adjusted operating margin compressed to 13% as customer acquisition spend more than doubled from a year earlier to $52.8 million.

Its expansion plans are aggressive. In 2025, Webull relaunched U.S. crypto, expanded bond trading, rolled out its Vega AI tool, and entered new markets such as the EU and South Korea. While the U.S. is its largest established market, the company is also pushing hard in the APAC region, with Hong Kong, Thailand, and Malaysia as primary sources of new customer demand.

Analyst coverage is thinner than for Robinhood or SoFi. With only five analysts following the company, three rate the stock a Buy, one says Hold and one rates it a Sell. The consensus for the five is a Moderate Buy. The 12-month price target is $13, more than an 80% upside from the company’s current level. And while the stock is down roughly 40% over the past year, more recent months show it performing better than competitors.

Retail Trading Platforms Face Common Risks

Despite their differences, Robinhood, SoFi, and Webull each face a common set of risks that investors should keep in mind. None of them pay dividends, and all three are sensitive to the broader market environment in ways that traditional banks are not. A sustained drop in trading volumes, an economic slowdown, or a regulatory crackdown could hit earnings hard.

Competition from large incumbents like Charles Schwab (NYSE: SCHW) and JPMorgan Chase (NYSE: JPM), which have much more firepower, may be a permanent ceiling. And as investors age, so do their comfort levels. Gen Z and Millennials won’t trade as they do now forever.

SoFi Offers the Strongest Long-Term Case

Among the three, SoFi presents the most balanced investment case right now, despite the lower analyst rating. Robinhood is a legitimate option for investors who want leveraged exposure to retail trading activity. Webull, which is the easiest to call, probably deserves a wait-and-see.

After all, in fintech, patience is usually rewarded over impulse. Platforms that compound over a decade are the ones that prove themselves quarter after quarter, and right now, each of these is telling a different story. READ THIS STORY ONLINE

I wouldn’t let this sit in your inbox (Ad)

The SpaceX filing got attention – but according to macroeconomic strategist Dr. Mark Skousen of The Oxford Club, June 1 is the date that actually matters.

Skousen warns that waiting for the broader crowd to wake up to what June 1 could mean may leave you with a very different opportunity than the one available right now.SEE WHY JUNE 1 SHOULD BE YOUR TOP INVESTMENT PRIORITY TODAY

As Broadcom Eclipses $2 Trillion, Private Credit Giants Wants In

Written by Leo Miller

Over the past several weeks, semiconductor giant Broadcom (NASDAQ: AVGO) has entered rarified air, with its market capitalization eclipsing $2 trillion. Broadcom is now one of just six companies in the world in this territory, becoming more valuable than giants like Meta Platforms (NASDAQ: META) and Tesla (NASDAQ: TSLA).

Notably, shares fell below $300 in late March, a level not seen since September 2025. Broadcom has since rebounded mightily, closing at or above $430 multiple times in May. Overall, Broadcom shares are closing in on a 50% gain since March lows.

An interesting report recently surfaced around the firm, with potential implications that could be both positive and negative. 

According to Bloomberg, the company is in discussions with two alternative asset management giants to receive billions in debt funding. 

While this move signals confidence in Broadcom’s outlook for its artificial intelligence (AI) chips, it also raises questions, given the company’s already significant debt levels.

Broadcom, Blackstone, and Apollo: Private Credit Eyes AI Infrastructure

Asset management companies Blackstone (NYSE: BX) and Apollo Global Management (NYSE: APO) are reportedly in talks with Broadcom to provide $35 billion in private credit funding. Details around the potential deal are minimal, but the funds would reportedly support Broadcom’s AI chip development roadmap.

From Broadcom’s perspective, this indicates that the company is highly confident in the demand for its chips going forward. $35 billion is no small sum; the agreement would be one of the largest private credit deals ever. It is unlikely that Broadcom would engage in the deal without strong multi-year visibility.

The report also signals confidence in Broadcom’s future from Blackstone and Apollo—lenders who surely want to recoup their principal with meaningful interest over time.

Broadcom’s Already Debt Sits Above $60B

Near the end of 2023, Broadcom acquired VMware in a deal worth $69 billion. The acquisition has been a clear success. Since VMware came onto Broadcom’s books in its fiscal Q1 2024, its quarterly infrastructure software revenue has increased from $4.75 billion to $6.78 billion. That is good for a strong compound annual growth rate of just under 20%. Broadcom has also significantly improved VMware’s margins, cutting costs while also increasing prices.

However, the deal also greatly increased Broadcom’s debt. Between its fiscal Q4 2023 and fiscal Q1 2024, Broadcom’s total debt nearly doubled from $39.6 billion to $75.9 billion. Notably, Broadcom has made solid headway in reducing its debt since then, with the figure falling by around 13% to $66.1 billion last quarter. Adding $35 billion in private credit financing could put its total debt near $100 billion, far greater than post-VMware heights.

Still, raw debt levels themselves don’t tell the full story of Broadcom’s solvency situation. One key metric of balance sheet health is the Net Debt to EBITDA ratio. This is also called the “Leverage Ratio.”

Balance Sheet Breakdown: Broadcom’s Theoretical Leverage Ratio

Note that: Net Debt/EBITDA = (Total Debt – Cash) / (Quarterly EBITDA x 4)

With 66.1 billion in total debt, $14.2 billion in cash and equivalents, and fiscal Q1 EBITDA of $10.8 billion, Broadcom’s Net Debt/EBITDA ratio is roughly 1.2x. This is healthy. For reference, S&P Global recently evaluated the theoretical health of Texas Instruments’ (NASDAQ: TXN) balance sheet after a proposed acquisition. S&P said Texas Instruments would have “a strong balance sheet with net debt to EBITDA comfortably below 1.5x following transaction close.”

Adding $35 billion in debt would shoot Broadcom’s figure up to 2x. While certainly more elevated, this is not particularly problematic. Leverage ratios below 3x are generally acceptable.

Furthermore, it’s unlikely that Broadcom would draw down this debt all at once. Additionally, as is common with private credit deals, a significant portion of the debt may never actually go on Broadcom’s balance sheet. Lastly, Broadcom is growing its EBITDA rapidly. Its last 12 months’ EBITDA rose by 54.5% YOY as of last quarter. With strong growth expected to continue, its leverage ratio could improve quickly.

Broadcom Remains on Strong Footing

Overall, if Broadcom were to engage in this private credit deal, its balance sheet would still be in good shape. This makes the idea that Broadcom is considering the deal to pursue growth initiatives not overly worrisome.

Notably, Broadcom shares gained significantly, by around 4.2%, on the day Bloomberg released this report. However, chip stocks in general showed strength that day, with the iShares Semiconductor ETF (NASDAQ: SOXX)rising more than 5%. At a minimum, this reaction indicates that markets did not view the report as a large negative for Broadcom, consistent with this analysis. Still, it will be worth watching how the market reacts should the deal actually materialize. READ THIS STORY ONLINE

The one thing behind SpaceX IPO nobody is pricing in (Ad)

SpaceX, Starlink, and xAI cannot scale without real power, real equipment, and real hardware – and that infrastructure cannot be built overnight.

Dr. Mark Skousen, Macroeconomic Strategist at The Oxford Club, believes the biggest opportunity is not in the IPO itself but in the backdoor beneficiaries likely to move as Wall Street prepares for what could be the largest listing in history.SEE THE OVERLOOKED INFRASTRUCTURE PLAYS POSITIONED AHEAD OF THE SPACEX IPO

Target the Red-Hot Spin-Off and Merger Space With These ETFs

Written by Nathan Reiff

Spin-offs and mergers may appeal to investors because they can signal a company’s efforts to focus its business, realign its operations, or even seek new leadership. In the case of large conglomerates, it can be hard for investors to accurately assess which units might be the most profitable or fastest-growing—a spin-off can help clarify.

These deals can also lead to new opportunities to find high-growth businesses that were once attached to more stable firms, or to access mispriced stocks that have been impacted by forced selling by institutional investors or funds. However, because keeping track of all of the M&A and spin-off activity taking place across the market may take up a disproportionate amount of an investor’s time, two exchange-traded funds (ETFs) are uniquely designed to focus on developments of this kind.

A High-Flying Spin-Off Fund Successfully Capturing Growth Opportunities

The Invesco S&P Spin-Off ETF (NYSEARCA: CSD) targets an index of firms that have recently gone through a split, leading to the dismantling of a portion of a business and its formation as a new publicly traded entity. Investors in this fund make a bet that the spin-off process may be able to open access to new value in this new company, allowing for outsized growth.

Specifically, CSD focuses only on the companies that have been spun off (and only those going through this process within the last four years), not the preexisting firms that did the spinning off. It also includes companies across the full market capitalization spectrum, given that many companies emerging from spin-offs are substantially smaller than their larger siblings. The majority of firms in CSD’s basket are mid-cap companies, and it includes both highly publicized spin-offs like GE Vernova Inc. (NYSE: GEV) as well as more niche firms like Solventum Corp. (NYSE: SOLV), which spun off from 3M Co. (NYSE: MMM).

The universe of recent spin-offs is not huge, and CSD has just over two dozen holdings in its portfolio. These are not weighted evenly, and the largest position represents more than 12% of the total asset base. The combination of fairly narrow basket and selected companies being heavily weighted means that CSD may carry greater risks than some other broader funds. However, its year-to-date (YTD) return of more than 35% might go a long way to ease investor concern, even with an expense ratio of 0.64%.

A Merger Arbitrage Approach Condensed Into an ETF

On the other side is the ProShares Merger ETF (BATS: MRGR), an ETF with a merger arbitrage strategy, capitalizing on the spread between the current stock price of a potential acquisition target and the price offered by the acquiring company. Because merger arbitrage can be a complex and risky endeavor for investors to take on independently, a passively managed ETF may make for an easier access point.

MRGR targets roughly 40 companiesand divides its investments fairly evenly across its portfolio. As an arbitrage-focused fund, MRGR employs both long and short positions to profit from price inefficiencies. On the long side it is most heavily weighted toward health care and financials names, while on the short side it focuses primarily on materials and industrials.

Thanks to its unique approach, MRGR is not designed to move in tandem with the share prices of its holdings over time. The fund has so far returned only about 1% YTD, but it pays a compelling distribution. Investors currently enjoy a dividend yield of about 3.2% from this fund. For its uncommon strategy, investors should expect to spend a bit more for this fund—its expense ratio is 0.75%.

Of course, there are other ways mergers can be profitable as well, but investors may have to seek companies looking to merge outside the ETF space. Still, a relatively modest level of risk in the form of an arbitrage-focused ETF may appeal to investors seeking an alternative approach to companies in this stage of development.

Investors might want to keep in mind that the two funds above may perform very differently depending on overall market conditions. Spin-offs, for example, tend to do well during bull markets when investors have more of an appetite for riskier high-growth names. Merger arbitrage is a useful approach during volatile periods because it doesn’t rely on market direction. In this way, the funds may balance one another out and provide opportunities to benefit in contrasting environments. READ THIS STORY ONLINE

Why I am looking at SpaceX IPO this way (Ad)

The SpaceX IPO is no longer a rumor. Reuters is reporting on the filing, CNBC is covering Project Apex, and the biggest banks in the world are already positioning.

Dr. Mark Skousen, Macroeconomic Strategist at The Oxford Club, says this may be the last clean window to act before June turns this into a full-blown media event.GET DR. SKOUSEN’S FREE SPACEX PRE-IPO RECOMMENDATION BEFORE THE WINDOW CLOSES

The Night Owl is a financial newsletter that provides in-depth market analysis on stocks of interest to individual investors. Published by MarketBeat and Early Bird Publishing, The Night Owl is delivered around 9:00 PM Eastern Sunday through Thursday. If you give a hoot about the market, The Night Owl is the newsletter for you.

View as a Web Page

If you have questions about your newsletter, please email our South Dakota based support team at contact@marketbeat.com.

Unsubscribe

© 2006-2026 MarketBeat Media, LLC. All rights protected.
345 N Reid Place, Suite 620, Sioux Falls, SD 57103. United States of America..

Today’s Featured Link: I wouldn’t let this sit in your inbox(From The Oxford Club)