“Some laws are not written, but are more decisive than any written law.”
—Seneca the Elder
Good morning! Today, we’re covering how the U.S. strikes on Iran sent a message to China, the Trump administration’s lawsuit against all the federal judges in Maryland, and the Federal Reserve’s move to ease a key bank capital rule to boost Treasury market stability.
Why US Strikes on Iran Sent a Message to ChinaThe short-lived war between Israel and Iran has highlighted Iran’s partnerships with other U.S. adversaries, mainly Russia and communist China. Though no formal alliance exists between Iran, China, Russia, and other aligned states, their political and economic relationships are often seen as a de facto coalition opposed to the U.S.-led West.
Cai Shenkun, an overseas Chinese independent commentator, told The Epoch Times that the decision by President Donald Trump to launch a surgical strike on Iran’s nuclear facilities was not just to set back its nuclear program, but also to send a message to other governments with anti-U.S. leanings.
In previous months, Trump had earned a reputation as a businessman unwilling to involve the United States in military conflict, Cai said. “But now it’s clear that these dictators can’t predict his moves, so they’re genuinely afraid of him,” he said. “Trump acts decisively—if he says he’ll strike, he won’t hesitate.” (More)
Fed Moves to Ease Key Bank Capital Rule to Boost Treasury Market StabilityThe Federal Reserve has advanced a long-awaited proposal to loosen a post-2008 capital requirement for the nation’s largest banks, aiming to reduce pressure that discourages them from holding low-risk assets like U.S. Treasurys. Fed officials say the move is intended to boost liquidity and prevent dysfunction in critical markets during periods of stress.
Approved by a 5–2 vote on June 25, the draft rule would recalibrate the enhanced supplementary leverage ratio by replacing fixed buffers with risk-based ones, reducing capital requirements for the nation’s biggest banks by an estimated 1.4 percent.
Supporters say the change is a “sensible fix” that restores the rule’s original intent and helps prevent Treasury market dysfunction. But dissenting Fed governors warn the cuts go too far, raising the risk of future bank failures and taxpayer exposure.
The proposal is now open for public comment and may signal broader shifts in how regulators balance financial safety with market efficiency.
Click to read how this regulatory shift could reshape big-bank behavior—and why not everyone is convinced it’s a good idea.
“Every unlawful order entered by the district courts robs the executive branch of its most scarce resource: time to put its policies into effect,” the June 24 complaint by the Justice Department states. “In the process, such orders diminish the votes of the citizens who elected the head of the executive branch.”
The District of Maryland has multiple locations with judges who have issued injunctions against the administration’s immigration enforcement. It was the venue, for example, for the high-profile lawsuit challenging Kilmar Abrego-Garcia’s deportation under the Alien Enemies Act. The lawsuit comes after months of clashes between the judicial and executive branches, particularly over the Alien Enemies Act and how far judges could go in blocking the president’s policies. (More)
For much of his long life, English author Somerset Maugham (1874–1965) was wildly popular with the public. He first attracted attention with his plays, but it was his off-stage fiction—short stories like “Rain” and novels like “Of Human Bondage”—that won him worldwide acclaim and made him one of the most famous authors of the 20th century.
Hollywood produced successful films of both these stories, as well as many others, which added to his renown. Even after his death, movies based on his work, like “The Painted Veil” and “The Razor’s Edge,” proved to be box office hits.
However, the scorn showered on Maugham by many critics during his lifetime, who judged his work as second-rate and lowbrow, has taken the shine off that popularity. Far fewer people read Maugham these days. Far fewer still have heard of Maugham’s last play, his 1933 “Sheppey.”
Yet within that satiric comedy is one of the most famous passages of 20th-century literature, the story about Death’s appointment in Samarra.
The plot goes as follows: Joseph Miller, nicknamed “Sheppey” for his birthplace, the Isle of Sheppey, wins a small fortune in the lottery. From that point on, those who know him—his wife, his daughter, the owner of the salon where he works as a hairdresser, and others—want a piece of the action.
Fearing that Sheppey is wasting the money on charity and on the possible purchase of a piece of land on the island, they find a psychiatrist who, after meeting with Sheppey, declares this witty, simple man mentally incompetent.
At the play’s end, before anyone can act on the psychiatrist’s diagnosis and have Sheppey committed, Death pays him a visit. She soon reveals that she has come to take him away. Sheppey first considers it a joke, then a mistake, and finally a relief.
The Epoch Times. 229 W. 28 St. Fl. 7 New York, NY 10001 | Contact Us
* When sharing an article, giftaccess@TheEpochTimes.com is added to the list of recipients. If your friend is not already a subscriber, we will send them a special link for free access to the article.
Our Morning Brief newsletter is one of the best ways to receive the most up-to-date information. If you no longer wish to receive these emails, unsubscribe here.