RJ Hamster
Our 20th Annual Report Card
Delivering World-Class Financial Research Since 1999
How I won big in Atlantic City… Where luck meets skill… Working the odds to your favor… How we grade our products… Kicking off our 20th annual Report Card…
It was the only time in my life I thought I’d have to sleep on the street.
And it came at the end of a real heater.
It was 2003, and I (Stansberry Research Publisher Matt Weinschenk) was a college junior. And the poker boom was in full swing.
When Chris Moneymaker (yes, his real name) turned $86 into $2.5 million by winning the World Series of Poker, the game exploded in popularity.
ESPN had hours of poker coverage. Online sites offered round-the-clock play for real money.
And I spent multiple nights each week at lopsided card tables in messy dorm rooms grinding out hundreds of dollars at a time.
Then I got invited to Atlantic City…
A friend’s family was spending the weekend in New Jersey’s gambling mecca. They offered me a place to stay. I just needed to get there.
On campus at the University of Pittsburgh, the pots usually reached $200… maybe $300. In Atlantic City, you could make real money. And it was just six hours away.
My poker buddy Donnie and I didn’t have a car that could get us there. But we ran the numbers. We could hit three local games before the weekend. If we won all three and pooled our money, we could scrounge up enough cash for a rental car and the entry fee for a poker tournament.
Were poker purely a matter of luck, we’d have had a 0.8% chance of taking all three games. But it’s not. I knew I was good. And I was counting on my skill to make the difference.
Together, Donnie and I netted three wins, a couple second-place finishes, and $600.
Then we drove to Atlantic City… jumped into the tournament… and, five hours later, came out with more than $4,000. I’d won.
This isn’t a story about how I’m a poker genius. Sure, I thought I was one at the time…
Actually, Donnie and I were complete idiots…
First, just before the tournament began, we got a call from our friend. He wasn’t coming to Atlantic City after all.
There went our free place to stay.
The Tropicana wanted $500 for a last-minute room. That wasn’t going to happen. And we had no backup plan.
We entered the tournament with our minds on our sleeping arrangements, not on our games. That’s no way to play poker.
And then it got worse… Every other player at the table immediately did their damnedest to lose.
You see, this $100 tournament had a “rebuy” policy. If you had a single chip less than your original stack, you could rebuy in for another $100 and get a second stack.
All the Atlantic City old-timers knew this strategy. And they used it to double their might at the poker table.
Donnie and I weren’t prepared for this. We were sitting behind stacks half the size of the other hundreds of players’. This meant we were extreme long shots.
On top of that, when I mentally reviewed my hands afterward, I realized I’d made a lot of mistakes.
Once, I had all my money in on a 4-to-1 shot… and won with a lucky card. Another lucky draw delivered a win on a 20-to-1 shot.
I’d done everything wrong… from dicey plays, to failing to prepare for the “rebuy” policy, to planning our trip without enough extra funds in reserve.
Other players did everything right, and I still beat them.
But was I any good, or just lucky?
I was good… I was a sharp poker player with a lot of wins under my belt.
But I wasn’t as good as I thought. If I hadn’t gotten just the right cards at just the right time, I’d have ended up like the rest of the losers.
Most sports are a mix of luck and skill – but that mix varies a lot…
In basketball, for example, the best team usually wins. Each team gets about 100 possessions per game. Each one can be worth 2 or 3 points. If the better team scores on a higher percentage of possessions, they’ll win out over time.
In football, luck plays a bigger role. The ball bounces in weird ways. And a single fumble or dropped pass can mean a seven-point difference in a game that averages about 23 points per team.
Researcher Michael Mauboussin demonstrates this mathematically and plots different sports along his Skill-Luck Continuum… ranging from chess (pure skill) to roulette (pure luck).
Mauboussin is a brilliant researcher who has worked at Morgan Stanley, Credit Suisse, Legg Mason, and more. He shared this Skill-Luck Continuum in his book The Success Equation: Untangling Skill and Luck in Business, Sports, and Investing.
And investing, which Mauboussin illustrates with a stock chart, is closer to a slot machine than it is to a hockey game…
Well, hold on a minute here…
If investing depends so much on luck, why are we all here working so hard at it?
Well, that’s because there still is skill. It matters. And it especially matters over the long term.
Mauboussin concedes…
There is a big difference between saying that the short-term results of investment managers are mostly luck and saying they are all luck… Investing, especially over relatively short periods of time, is more a matter of luck than of skill.
There’s more…
Mauboussin’s prescription for assessing investing in the presence of luck is this: Focus on process.
If an activity involves luck, then how well you do in the short run doesn’t tell you much about your skill, because you can do everything right and still fail, or you can do everything wrong and succeed. For activities near the luck side of the continuum, a good process is the surest path to success in the long run.
He later says…
A good process can lead to a bad outcome some percentage of the time, and a bad process can lead to a good outcome. Since a good process offers the highest probability of a good outcome over time, the emphasis has to be on process.
And he finally ties it directly to investing…
Good process must be well grounded analytically, psychologically, and organizationally. The analytical part requires finding a discrepancy between value and price that gives you an edge… For an investor, it’s buying a stream of future cash flows for less than they are worth.
As with poker, basketball, and football, you can work the investing odds to your favor…
You do all your research. Make your best predictions. Carefully manage your risk.
There’s still no such thing as a guaranteed return. But by avoiding mistakes, over time, a smart investor will grow their wealth.
That brings us to 2025…
The benchmark S&P 500 Index was up 16% last year. Lots of stocks did even better.
But in the words of economist Humphrey Neill, “Don’t confuse brains with a bull market.”
Even if you posted big returns last year, you have to ask yourself… were you good… or were you just lucky?
As we open our annual Stansberry Research Report Card, we see a mix of skill and luck in our publications’ model portfolios… and in the benchmarks we’re comparing them with.
We’ve been doing our annual Report Card grades for 20 years now. Every year, we evaluate all our newsletters and other services and publish the results.
And to my knowledge, we’re the longest-running publisher in the business to follow this path of radical transparency.
This year, I’m taking over for Brett Aitken, who now works for our parent company MarketWise. But I’ll treat the Report Card the same way that Brett did… and that our founder Porter Stansberry did before him.
I’ll compare the performance of our products’ investment recommendations with their respective benchmarks… score the results with a letter grade… explain my analysis… and show the data I used to draw my conclusion.
We perform this review every year because we believe it is important to hold ourselves accountable for our performance.
When you put your money into our editors’ investment recommendations, you’re giving us a lot of trust. It’s essential to us that we earn that trust. When we have phenomenal results to share, we want you to hear about them…
But this is not a marketing exercise or a fluff piece. There are no participation trophies. When one of our editors or services is underperforming, we won’t hold back. This isn’t a new-age kindergarten where everyone gets an A. Sometimes, one of our newsletters earns an F. And it hurts.
As the publisher of Stansberry Research, it’s my job to find and employ skilled investors who can deliver real performance for you when you read their work…
As a subscriber, you want an answer to the simple question…
Is this newsletter I’m reading any good at picking stocks and making me wealthier?
The luck inherent in investing makes the truth of that answer easy to hide.
But we’re not going to hide anything in this Report Card.
We won’t just show you that we had a great 2025. We’ll show you our one-year gains, yes, but also our five-year returns.
Here’s what I’m going to do… like we’ve done for 20 years.
I’m going to grade each and every service from A to F, just like in school. You know what these grades mean.
You’ll see the performance numbers that help inform my judgments, but I’ll also be reflecting on each product’s mandate. For example, a safe portfolio of dividend stocks is there to protect you just as much as it is to earn returns and build wealth. So I might pay more attention to its consistency than its average gain… while doing the opposite with a more aggressive, speculative product.
We publish a lot of research across many newsletters and other services. So I’ll be reviewing them in pieces over the next few weeks.
Today, I’m going to focus on our three Portfolio Solutions products. These are fully allocated, built-for-you portfolios that compare directly to market performance.
Two of these portfolios underperformed… There’s no other way to address it. It wasn’t a good year for them. And I’ll show you why.
And then, I’m going to turn to a service with outstanding performance last year… and for many years prior.
I think you’ll want to read about this one. Because if you’ve got any struggles as an investor, be it low returns, lack of time, or confusion, this could be the exact thing you are looking for.
Here is our 2025 Report Card on the Portfolio Solutions…
Now let me explain my grades in detail. I’ll start with our two laggards: Stansberry’s Forever Portfolio and The Quant Portfolio.
Stansberry’s Forever Portfolio: C (1-year), B (5-year)
The Quant Portfolio: C (1-year), B- (since inception, June 2023)
I’m not here to sugarcoat it. Stansberry’s Forever Portfolio and The Quant Portfolio both underperformed last year.
And even though they are very different products, both their portfolios underperformed for the exact same reason.
Stansberry’s Forever Portfolio is made up of “forever stocks.” These are household names and other high-quality businesses that we believe you can buy now and never sell.
When you hear the stories of how people have built true wealth in the stock market, they generally haven’t done so by day trading or chasing trends. Rather, they bought iconic companies like Coca-Cola (KO) and Microsoft (MSFT) and held them for decades.
That’s the goal of the Forever Portfolio.
However, even forever stocks have down years.
In 2025 (measured since we rebalanced our Portfolio Solutions portfolios in early February), we struggled with holdings like Novo Nordisk (NVO) and Starbucks (SBUX), which declined 36% and 20%, respectively.
And our technology companies hit a rough patch. Salesforce (CRM) fell 21% as it faces a challenge from artificial intelligence. And PayPal (PYPL) fell 35% as all payments stocks had their worst year since the Great Recession.
We had lots of big wins to offset these. Google parent Alphabet (GOOGL) rose 56%, and precious metals giant Franco-Nevada (FNV) rose 52%. We also got market-beating returns from very safe stocks like candymaker Hershey (HSY), up 27%… and insurance companies Travelers (TRV), up 20%, and W.R. Berkley (WRB), up 21%.
Overall, this portfolio made money last year… but not much. It rose 2.7% since February 3, while the benchmark S&P 500 Index jumped 15.4% during that same period. That’s why Stansberry’s Forever Portfolio scored a C for 2025.
Since its inception in 2020, the Forever Portfoliohas compounded at 15.9% per year.
That’s great. That’s the pace you want to build long-term wealth. And in a down market, these are the kinds of stocks that will protect you.
But it has been such a hot five years for the stock market, we’re behind the benchmark S&P 500. So even the Forever Portfolio‘s five-year performance gets a B in this year’s Report Card.
We’ll come to the reasons shortly… But let’s look at The Quant Portfolio first.
The Quant Portfolio is a selection of stocks identified as great businesses by our proprietary Stansberry Score, combined with a diversification algorithm to maximize returns but also minimize risk. It’s completely run by a computer.
This system produced great back-testing results, and subscribers enjoyed a couple years of sterling performance as well.
In 2025, it didn’t work.
Last year, The Quant Portfolio was up 4.5%… only slightly better than the Forever Portfolio. And I’m giving it a C as well.
The two portfolios lagged for the same reason…
In 2025, investors loved junk stocks.
Remember, both of these portfolios start with high-quality businesses.
After decades of experience, we at Stansberry Research believe that’s the best way to invest: Become a partial owner in high-quality businesses with big margins and defensible moats, and do so at a reasonable price.
Over the long term, it works. But it doesn’t always work over the short term.
When investors feel frisky… they consider stocks that they know they shouldn’t buy. They pile into overvalued shares and businesses with no profits.
In a hot bull market, these junk stocks look attractive as high-leverage ways to get fast returns.
In 2025, the trashy stocks called out to investors and they piled in, leaving quality stocks by the wayside.
The end-of-year Barron’s issue sported a cover with a mock sale announcement: “Now on Sale! Quality Stocks, 40% Cheaper.”
The investment bank UBS finds that since the beginning of March, low-quality stocks have beaten high-quality stocks by 50 percentage points.
When you have two portfolios based purely on business quality… and no one cares about quality… it’s hard to keep up.
But we’re keeping the faith.
Think back to Atlantic City in 2003… For a few hours, my lucky poker hands let me skate past my better-prepared rivals. But if I’d put my winnings back onto the table the next day, without upping my game… I’d have gone back to Pittsburgh empty-handed.
Some investors will book last year’s gains on their junk stocks. Most of them will still be holding as they crash down.
All the while, the Forever Portfolio and The Quant Portfolio will take the odd outperformance, then get back to grinding out winning years.
These are the questions we need to ask as we manage these portfolios:
- Do good businesses outperform over the long run? Unequivocally, yes. The historical long-term returns prove this out.
- Will this run in low-quality stocks continue forever? Of course not. They soared in the bull market of 2021, only to fall 90% in many instances.
- Will quality stocks soon get their due? Given that the thesis for quality stocks makes so much sense, the long-term performance isn’t a fluke. They will reign again.
These answers form many of our core beliefs as investors.
If we didn’t have some faith in the power of quality stocks, I’d hit these services with a lower letter grade.
But they are doing what they are supposed to do. They’re supposed to hold quality stocks, not chase risky trends. And quality stocks will come back.
If you hold that belief as well, then buckle up and get ready for the Forever Portfolio and The Quant Portfolio to have blistering returns when junk stocks fall to Earth.
Like the Forever Portfolio, The Quant Portfolio has done better over the long term. Since we launched the service in June 2023, it has returned 45.6%.
That trails the S&P 500’s 65.5% rise during that same period, so The Quant Portfolio will earn a B- for its long-term performance. But it shows what this portfolio is capable of – without taking on the elevated risk of low-quality or overvalued stocks. These portfolios will rise again.
It could very well happen in 2026. But if it takes a bit longer, we don’t mind being patient. We know that we’ve got a tried-and-true investment philosophy on our side.
Now, let’s turn to a portfolio that needs no patience…
The Total Portfolio: A+ (1-year), A (5-year)
The Total Portfolio crushed 2025.
The description of The Total Portfolio is contained almost entirely within the name.
It’s a fully allocated, done-for-you portfolio. It’s something we want you to be comfortable putting 100% of your wealth into, if you choose.
That means it doesn’t contain just stocks. It’s balanced.
We separate the portfolio thematically into Get Rich holdings – like growth stocks – and Stay Rich holdings – like gold, insurance companies, water utilities, and bonds.
We want high returns, but we’re laser-focused on risk.
As such, we don’t benchmark ourselves against the S&P 500, but rather the Vanguard Balanced Index Fund (VBINX). This essentially tracks a “60/40” stock/bond portfolio.
As you see in the performance recap, for 2025, The Total Portfolio beat its benchmark 17.8% to 11.6%. That’s an A+ performance.
In other words, if you’d followed our advice, you’d have made 53% more money last year than someone who’d held the Vanguard Balanced Index Fund.
Over five years, we’re up 58.2% to 41.5%. Between the size of that gain and its outperformance versus the benchmark, I’m giving The Total Portfolio an A for five-year performance.
And since inception in 2017, we’re up 185% versus 123% for the benchmark.
Here’s what’s most shocking…
Even though we’re focused on risk and balance, we also beat the S&P 500’s 15.4% rise for 2025 in a major bull market (again, starting in February).
This is the holy grail of investing: a market-beating portfolio with balance and safety.
We do it by putting in a lot of work… on our end.
The Total Portfolio relies on the research done across all our publications. We draw from at least 21 different primary research publications. These are the newsletters you read from our staff of analysts and experts.
Then we convene our Investment Committee, which includes Dr. David “Doc” Eifrig, Whitney Tilson, Brett Eversole, Alan Gula, and me.
Together, we review all these publications and pick the best of the best investments.
More importantly, we work to understand how these investments work together. For every AI stock we include, we offset it with a safer play. We consider the correlations between each, making sure some zig when others zag. And we size each investment according to our conviction.
In other words, we do the real work of turning ideas into a total portfolio… something we don’t think anyone else in our industry does to this level.
This is not an easy process. But by the time The Total Portfolio gets to subscribers, it’s all in a simple package. Most months, subscribers just have to buy or sell a few stocks.
Even our readers probably don’t appreciate the amount of research and collaboration that goes into these portfolios. They just see the returns.
But our debates are intense. We all have strong beliefs about the market. And we don’t all agree. The conversations get serious.
We all know and respect each other. I’ve worked with most of these guys for more than a decade. We wouldn’t keep doing it unless we loved it.
And we are all working toward the same goal: better returns for you. And that keeps us on a constructive track toward solving what’s really happening in markets.
To give credit where it’s due, we rely on Alan Gula to make the final call and turn these debates into a portfolio.
Alan has been investing since he was 14 years old. And he’s spent his entire professional life working in the financial markets – first at Goldman Sachs and later at Barclays, where he had a front-row seat to the financial crisis.
Alan understands the modern, complex portfolio math that helps make sense of a couple of dozen positions.
Now, since I’m on the Investment Committee but am also writing this Report Card… am I grading myself? Yes, but that doesn’t take away from the validity of the grades. I’m publishing the numbers I used to make my decisions.
I also get input on all the Report Card grades from MarketWise colleagues who don’t work for me and aren’t directly involved in these publications.
Finally, our annual Report Card has a history of tough self-criticism. Famously, Porter Stansberry once gave himself an F. If The Total Portfolio were flailing, I wouldn’t pretend otherwise.
But as the numbers show, the opposite is true for this year’s Report Card.
Consider the following points from 2025…
We’ve been on top of the historic rise in gold and precious metals. In Stansberry’s Forever Portfolio, we held Franco-Nevada, which rose 52% last year… topping off a 184% run since we bought it.
We also added Pan American Silver (PAAS) to the portfolio in August, right before silver went on its historic run, earning us 85% in just a few months.
And we made the right calls on AI. Holdings in Alphabet, electrical-engineering firm ABB (ABBNY), and semiconductor-equipment supplier Applied Materials (AMAT) rose 56%, 40%, and 78% respectively, in 2025 alone.
I could go on about gains… But what I really care about is risk.
Do you remember how you felt in April? The international economic order appeared to be falling apart as fresh tariff news rocked the market every day. The S&P 500 fell 19% in a few weeks.
When the markets tanked during the “tariff tantrum,” we held 11 positions that rose.
Those included:
- A super-safe water utility
- High-quality insurance companies that are central to Stansberry Research’s investment philosophy
- Financial exchanges, which benefit from volatility
- A pawn shop, which benefits when recession threatens
- Top-notch consumer-staples firms
On The Total Portfolio’s worst day, it was down less than 5% on the year.
Our focus on diversification and risk management protected our portfolio – making it about half as risky as the S&P 500.
While so many investors focus on returns, limiting risk is how you make money. It’s more difficult. And many nonprofessional investors don’t have the tools or time to manage their money this way.
But when you have a smaller hole to dig out of in market downturns, you compound your wealth much faster.
Back to our first question… are we any good?
Since The Total Portfolio pulls from all of our research and combines it into one specific product with specific goals and measurable performance… the answer is yes.
Remember Michael Mauboussin’s rules. The next bit of proof would be to analyze our process.
On that front, I can only let you decide. And we’re doing something special to give you a chance…
On Tuesday morning, we’re inviting you inside our Investment Committee meeting.
These debates have always been behind closed doors.
This time, you get to watch it all.
The Investment Committee (plus a special guest) will get together and debate what’s happening in Venezuela, how AI will affect energy demand, what Trump means for your portfolio… and more, I’m sure.
To help you get the most out of 2026, I also challenged each of our experts to share their top investment idea for the year.
They’ll share those ideas and walk you through their theses.
Everyone is invited. And I know that you’ll learn a lot about your own portfolio if you watch.
Click here to sign up for Tuesday’s event right now.
We’ll send you a reminder so you don’t forget.
As much as January is a time to disclose and review our performance with these Report Cards, it’s also time to prepare and plan for 2026 so that you don’t get left behind in these rapidly changing markets.
This wraps up the first piece of our annual Report Card…
I’d love to hear what you think. Do you have experience with our Portfolio Solutions products? Would you have chosen different grades?
Let me know at feedback@stansberryresearch.com. We read every letter.
And I’ll be back next week as I continue this coverage of our investment performance.
Recommended Links:
JANUARY 27: Five Stansberry Experts Name Their No. 1 Stock of 2026
Join us for “Game Plan 2026,” as five of our most respected analysts unveil our biggest buy call of the year… share a complete game plan for 2026… and even name their top individual stock ideas (names and tickers) 100% free of charge. Confirm your free viewing pass here.
Watch Live: The Most Lucrative New Trading Opportunity in Two Decades
It’s a new way to potentially double your portfolio in 2026 by predicting the biggest jumps on 5,000 stocks, BEFORE they occur. It shows how a colossal “divide” coming to U.S. stocks this year has opened the best opportunity in 21 years to apply this breakthrough new strategy today – including two free recommendations in a historic event backed by five Wall Street legends. Watch now before it goes offline.
New 52-week highs (as of 1/22/26): Agnico Eagle Mines (AEM), First Majestic Silver (AG), Amgen (AMGN), Valterra Platinum (ANGPY), ASML (ASML), Atmus Filtration Technologies (ATMU), ProShares Ultra Nasdaq Biotechnology (BIB), Alpha Architect 1-3 Month Box Fund (BOXX), Brady (BRC), CBOE Global Markets (CBOE), Donaldson (DCI), WisdomTree Japan SmallCap Dividend Fund (DFJ), DXP Enterprises (DXPE), Western Asset Emerging Markets Debt Fund (EMD), iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Fund (EMXC), EnerSys (ENS), Equinox Gold (EQX), iShares MSCI South Korea Fund (EWY), Cambria Emerging Shareholder Yield Fund (EYLD), FirstCash (FCFS), Franco-Nevada (FNV), Cambria Foreign Shareholder Yield Fund (FYLD), VanEck Gold Miners Fund (GDX), VanEck Junior Gold Miners Fund (GDXJ), Gilead Sciences (GILD), SPDR Gold Shares (GLD), Grail (GRAL), Hawaiian Electric Industries (HE), iShares Biotechnology Fund (IBB), iShares Convertible Bond Fund (ICVT), Illumina (ILMN), KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index Fund (KEMX), Kinross Gold (KGC), Kinder Morgan (KMI), L3Harris Technologies (LHX), Lockheed Martin (LMT), Newmont (NEM), Nucor (NUE), Nexstar Media (NXST), OR Royalties (OR), Ormat Technologies (ORA), Pan American Silver (PAAS), Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy Fund (PBW), Sprott Physical Gold Trust (PHYS), Sprott Physical Silver Trust (PSLV), Royal Gold (RGLD), Roche (RHHBY), Robo Global Robotics and Automation Index Fund (ROBO), Seabridge Gold (SA), Sibanye Stillwater (SBSW), Sprott (SII), Skeena Resources (SKE), iShares Silver Trust (SLV), Snap-on (SNA), SSR Mining (SSRM), Thermo Fisher Scientific (TMO), Torex Gold Resources (TORXF), Tenaris (TS), Sprott Physical Uranium Trust (U-U.TO), Uranium Energy (UEC), ProShares Ultra Gold (UGL), Vale (VALE), Vanguard FTSE Europe Fund (VGK), Telefônica Brasil (VIV), Wheaton Precious Metals (WPM), State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLE), ExxonMobil (XOM), and State Street SPDR S&P Semiconductor Fund (XSD).
One quick housekeeping note… As we said, today is only Part I of our Report Card. If you don’t see the grade and evaluation for a publication you’re looking for, watch for it in one of the next parts of the Report Card to come over the next few weeks.
In today’s mailbag, thoughts on Dan Ferris’ Digest from yesterday… more discussion about a U.S. “deal” with Greenland… and feedback on the redesigned Stansberry Research website, which debuted earlier this week… Do you have a comment or question? As always, e-mail us at feedback@stansberryresearch.com.
“Dan, I’ve followed you for many years and remember when your #1 stock was SII. I even owned it for a while. There’s a sportswriter here in LA named Bill Plaschke. Whenever he predicts a certain team will win, it’s the kiss of death. Fans write in to tell him not to predict their team’s victory. But it’s just superstition. So, if the market corrects soon, as I suspect based on Gann theory, the real-estate cycle, and the general chaos of the world, don’t blame yourself. I won’t.” – Subscriber Michael S.
“In general, I agree with both B.T. and Robert, the Art Of The Deal is how Trump has always operated. My real concern is the long-term damage being done by publicly bullying your allies. Acquiring mineral rights and defensive positions could easily have been done behind closed doors with the same amount of leverage. But Trump makes everything a public show… If your best friend shamed and bullied you in front of a large crowd, how long would you stay friends with them? I am greatly concerned about the future damage being done by a man who lives in the moment and does not consider the long-term repercussions. We’d better be prepared for what’s next or we could end up alone and isolated like Russia.” – Subscriber Darren N.
“On Greenland, I have to disagree that ‘Greenland is the strategic location between the USA and Russia’ because that is Alaska. Also, Greenland is a massive block of very deep ice, so mining for rare earths there will be difficult, very expensive and not quick. As for the ‘Art of the deal,’ when does that become the ‘Art of making enemies out of allies’? Wouldn’t it be smarter to win over the people of Greenland first? There is only 57,000 of them so that shouldn’t be too hard.” – Subscriber S.J.I.
“Dear Stansberry Folks, I love the new Website! You did an outstanding job on reconfiguring it. It’s constant care for your clients that keep me a valued member! Keep up the good work. I am very impressed.” – Subscriber Jeri P.
Good investing,
Matt Weinschenk
Publisher
Baltimore, Maryland
January 23, 2026
Stansberry Research Top 10 Open Recommendations
Top 10 highest-returning open stock positions across all Stansberry Research portfolios. Returns represent the total return from the initial recommendation.InvestmentBuy DateReturnPublicationMSFT
Microsoft02/10/121,454.3%Stansberry’s Investment AdvisoryMSFT
Microsoft11/11/101,440.6%Retirement MillionaireADP
Automatic Data Processing10/09/08970.5%Extreme ValueBRK.B
Berkshire Hathaway04/01/09776.1%Retirement MillionaireGOOGL
Alphabet12/15/16714.3%Retirement MillionaireWRB
W.R. Berkley03/15/12625.8%Stansberry’s Investment AdvisorySII
Sprott01/11/18587.6%Extreme ValueALS-T
Altius Minerals03/26/09586.8%Extreme ValueAXP
American Express08/04/16505.4%Stansberry’s Investment AdvisorySI
Silver bullion03/12/20503.8%Extreme Value
Please note: Securities appearing in the Top 10 are not necessarily recommended buys at current prices. The list reflects the best-performing positions currently in the model portfolio of any Stansberry Research publication. The buy date reflects when the editor recommended the investment in the listed publication, and the return shows its performance since that date. To learn if a security is still a recommended buy today, you must be a subscriber to that publication and refer to the most recent portfolio.
Top 10 Totals4Extreme ValueFerris3Retirement MillionaireDoc3Stansberry’s Investment AdvisoryPorter
Top 5 Crypto Capital Open Recommendations
Top 5 highest-returning open positions in the Crypto Capital model portfolioInvestmentBuy DateReturnPublicationBTC/USD
Bitcoin11/27/182,279.9%Crypto CapitalWSTETH/USD
Wrapped Staked Ethereum12/07/182,274.8%Crypto CapitalQRL/USD
Quantum Resistant Ledger01/19/211,038.5%Crypto CapitalONE/USD
Harmony12/16/191,025.4%Crypto CapitalPOL/USD
Polygon02/26/21652.4%Crypto Capital
Please note: Securities appearing in the Top 5 are not necessarily recommended buys at current prices. The list reflects the best-performing positions currently in the Crypto Capital model portfolio. The buy date reflects when the recommendation was made, and the return shows its performance since that date. To learn if it’s still a recommended buy today, you must be a subscriber and refer to the most recent portfolio.
Stansberry Research Hall of Fame
Top 10 all-time, highest-returning closed positions across all Stansberry portfoliosInvestmentDurationGainPublicationNvidia (NVDA)^*5.96 years1,466%Venture Tech.Microsoft (MSFT)^12.74 years1,185%Retirement MillionaireInovio Pharma. (INO)^1.01 years1,139%Venture Tech.Rocket Lab (RKLB)^2.35 years1,034%Venture Tech.Seabridge Gold (SA)^4.20 years995%Sjug Conf.Berkshire Hathaway (BRK-B)^16.13 years800%Retirement MillionaireIntellia Therapeutics (NTLA)1.95 years775%Amer. MoonshotsRite Aid 8.5% bond4.97 years773%True IncomePNC Warrants (PNC-WS)6.16 years706%True Wealth SystemsMaxar Technologies (MAXR)^1.90 years691%Venture Tech.
^ These gains occurred with a partial position in the respective stocks.
* Editor Dave Lashmet closed the first leg of this Nvidia position in November 2016 for a gain of about 108%. Then, he closed the second leg in July 2020 for a 777% return. And finally, in May 2022, he booked a 1,466% return on the final leg. Subscribers who followed his advice on Nvidia could’ve recorded a total weighted average gain of more than 600%.
Stansberry Research Crypto Hall of Fame
Top 5 highest-returning closed positions in the Crypto Capital model portfolioInvestmentDurationGainAnalystBand Protocol (BAND)0.31 years1,169%Crypto CapitalTerra (LUNA)0.41 years1,166%Crypto CapitalPolymesh (POLYX)3.84 years1,157%Crypto CapitalFrontier (FRONT)0.09 years979%Crypto CapitalBinance Coin (BNB)1.78 years963%Crypto Capital
You have received this e-mail as part of your subscription to Stansberry Digest. If you no longer want to receive e-mails from Stansberry Digest click here.
Published by Stansberry Research.
You’re receiving this e-mail at pahovis@aol.com. Stansberry Research welcomes comments or suggestions at feedback@stansberryresearch.com. This address is for feedback only. For questions about your account or to speak with customer service, call 888-261-2693 (U.S.) or 443-839-0986 (international) Monday-Friday, 9 a.m.-5 p.m. Eastern time. Or e-mail info@stansberryresearch.com. Please note: The law prohibits us from giving personalized financial advice.
© 2026 Stansberry Research. All rights reserved. Any reproduction, copying, or redistribution, in whole or in part, is prohibited without written permission from Stansberry Research, 1125 N Charles St, Baltimore, MD 21201 or stansberryresearch.com.
Any brokers mentioned constitute a partial list of available brokers and is for your information only. Stansberry Research does not recommend or endorse any brokers, dealers, or investment advisors.
Stansberry Research forbids its writers from having a financial interest in any security they recommend to our subscribers. All employees of Stansberry Research (and affiliated companies) must wait 24 hours after an investment recommendation is published online – or 72 hours after a direct mail publication is sent – before acting on that recommendation.
This work is based on SEC filings, current events, interviews, corporate press releases, and what we’ve learned as financial journalists. It may contain errors, and you shouldn’t make any investment decision based solely on what you read here. It’s your money and your responsibility.
