Below is an important message from one of our highly valued sponsors. Please read it carefully as they have some special information to share with you.

---

Dear Reader,

This is urgent, so I’ll be direct…

For the first time ever, James Altucher – one of America’s top venture capitalists – is sharing how ANYONE can get a pre-IPO stake in SpaceX… with as little as $100!

In other words, this is your first-ever chance to skip the line, and get in BEFORE Elon Musk’s next IPO takes place.

Best of all, it couldn’t be any easier…

When you act today, you can get a pre-IPO stake right inside your regular brokerage account, all with just $100 and a few minutes of time.

All you need is the name and ticker symbol that James reveals for FREE, right inside this short video.

[[Click here now to view.]]

Sincerely,

Doug Hill
VP of Publishing, Paradigm Press

---

This Week’s Bonus News

Plastic Surgery: Winners and Losers of the Proposed 10% Interest Cap

Authored by Jeffrey Neal Johnson. Publication Date: 1/13/2026. 

Quick Look

• The market’s reaction reflected a selective repricing, with high-APR-dependent lenders hit hardest and fee-driven models holding up better.
• A proposed 10% APR cap pressures subprime-focused card economics, widening the gap between traditional lenders and transaction-based platforms.
• Investors appear to be positioning for a credit vacuum, where displaced borrowers migrate to alternative financing and payments ecosystems.

The market reaction in the finance and fintechsectors on Jan. 12, 2026, was not a panic sell-off. It was a precise, calculated sorting event. Following the Trump administration’s announcement of a proposed 10% cap on credit card interest rates, the financial sector split. While headlines highlighted the drop in major indices, a closer look reveals clear divergences between two groups: traditional lenders and financial technology (fintech) companies.

Investors are witnessing what some are calling the “Great Rate Bifurcation.” Capital is rotating out of business models that rely on high Annual Percentage Rates (APRs) and flowing into alternative financing platforms. With the Federal Funds Rate currently between 3.5% and 3.75%, a 10% cap would squeeze traditional banks’ profit margins. This policy shock, reminiscent of earlier usury-limit proposals, has created a sizable opportunity for companies that operate outside the conventional lending model.

The Extinction Zone: Why Lenders Are Being Punished

Executive Order 14330: Trump’s Biggest Yet (Ad)

While President Trump’s official salary is $400,000 per year… his tax returns reveal he’s been collecting up to $250,000 PER MONTH from one hidden source. Until recently, most Americans couldn’t touch the type of investment that makes up this investment. But thanks to Executive Order 14330, that just changed. If you love investing in disruptive new companies…Discover how to invest in the fund Trump uses to collect this income >>

To understand why some stocks plunged while others held up, investors must look at the basic math of lending. Banks borrow at a given cost—currently near 3.75%—and lend to consumers. The difference between their funding cost and the rate charged to customers is their profit, known as the spread.

For prime borrowers with excellent credit, a 10% cap is manageable because defaults are rare and the bank can accept a thinner margin. But for risky or subprime borrowers, banks often charge 20%–30% to cover a much higher expected loss rate.

If regulators cap APRs at 10% while the cost of funds remains near 4%, the remaining margin is thin. After accounting for operational expenses—staff, branches, technology—and expected loan losses, banks would have little or no profit on loans to higher-risk customers, and could even lose money on those loans.

The market quickly identified companies most exposed to this “extinction zone”:

• Bread Financial (NYSE: BFH): The stock dropped more than 10% in one session. Bread specializes in store-branded credit cards for mall retailers, which typically carry higher rates to offset customer risk. A 10% cap would severely impair that business model.
• Synchrony Financial (NYSE: SYF): Down over 8%, Synchrony faces similar headwinds. As a major issuer of private-label cards for retailers, much of its profit depends on interest income that could be restricted by a cap.
• Capital One (NYSE: COF): Off more than 6%, Capital One is often seen as the subprime proxy among large banks. Its strategy of onboarding lower-credit consumers and later moving them to higher-tier products relies on correctly pricing initial risk; that pipeline would be disrupted by a strict APR limit.

A 10% cap would act as a hard ceiling on interest income for these businesses. For investors, two scenarios create different plays: if the cap is expected to take effect on Jan. 20, 2026, short positions on vulnerable lenders might look attractive; if the administration abandons the proposal, these beaten-down stocks could represent compelling entry points.

The Credit Vacuum: The Bull Case for Fintech

When traditional banks stop lending to subprime borrowers to protect margins, consumer demand for credit doesn’t disappear—it migrates. As banks tighten standards and turn away applicants with credit scores below roughly 660, a credit vacuum forms. That displacement fuels the bullish thesis for fintechs and alternative lenders.

Investors are betting that nonbank lenders will fill the void left by traditional banks. The difference is in the business model: conventional credit cards depend on revolving APRs, while many fintechs use Buy Now, Pay Later (BNPL) or merchant-fee-based systems.

BNPL firms typically earn revenue by charging merchants a fee for processing transactions rather than relying primarily on high APRs from consumers. Because their revenue comes from retailers as well as ancillary fees, they are less exposed to a consumer APR cap. While some BNPL names like Affirm (NASDAQ: AFRM) dipped on fears of regulatory contagion, investors moved toward companies that derive fees from merchants or other non-APR sources.

• Progressive Holdings (NYSE: PRG): The stock held up as investors view its Lease-to-Own (LTO) model as less exposed to APR caps. LTO arrangements are structured as rentals with an option to buy rather than traditional loans, which can place them outside standard APR regulations.
• Block (NYSE: XYZ): Block, parent of Cash App, also remained relatively stable. Its ecosystem generates significant interchange fees and uses small, fixed-fee borrowing structures rather than relying solely on compounding consumer interest—features that help insulate it from rate caps.
• SoFi Technologies (NASDAQ: SOFI): SoFi’s stock dipped only modestly because its digital platform offers personal loans and alternative payment options. Investors expect increased demand for personal loans to refinance high-interest debt or replace pulled credit lines.

In this view, regulatory pressure on banks is accelerating growth for fintech companies that can capture displaced borrowers. Investors who believe the cap will take effect may look to initiate or increase positions in these alternative credit providers.

The Fortress’s Moats and Toll Roads

For investors seeking stability rather than aggressive growth, large diversified financial institutions offer relative safety. They were not immune to the sell-off, but their size and multiple revenue streams provide a cushion that smaller lenders lack.

• JPMorgan Chase (NYSE: JPM): The stock fell roughly 1.5%. Compared with the double-digit losses seen elsewhere, this was modest; JPMorgan’s investment banking, asset management and trading businesses are largely insulated from consumer lending caps and help offset consumer-credit headwinds.
• Visa (NYSE: V) & Mastercard (NYSE: MA): These companies act like economic toll roads. They power payment networks while banks provide the lending. Although their shares pulled back modestly on concerns about consumer spending, their fee-for-swipe business model remains intact. In turbulent times, toll roads are often safer than the vehicles on them.

The New Rules of Engagement

The administration’s proposal has redrawn the map for financial investors. The old correlation—where all bank stocks moved in unison—has broken. The market is now rewarding innovation and punishing business models that depend on high-interest debt.

Legal challenges to the proposal are likely, but markets price probabilities, not certainties. Current odds favor agile fintech names that can operate in a lower-rate environment over lenders that rely on high APRs. The smart money appears to be rotating out of the “extinction zone” of pure-play lenders and into companies positioned to fill the credit vacuum.

Thank you for subscribing to Insider Trades Daily, which covers the most recent insider buying and selling activity from Wall Street CEO’s, CFO’s, COO’s and other insiders.

This email message is a sponsored email from Paradigm Press, a third-party advertiser of InsiderTrades.com and MarketBeat. 

This ad is sent on behalf of Paradigm Press, LLC, at 1001 Cathedral St., Baltimore, MD 21201. If you’re not interested in this opportunity from Paradigm Press, LLC, please click here to remove your email from these offers.

If you have questions about your account, please contact MarketBeat’s U.S. based support team at contact@marketbeat.com.

If you no longer wish to receive email from InsiderTrades.com, you can unsubscribe.

Copyright 2006-2026 MarketBeat Media, LLC. 
345 N Reid Place #620, Sioux Falls, S.D. 57103. USA..

Link of the Day: Top 10 U.S. Stocks to Buy & Forget Until 2030(Click to Opt-In)