RJ Hamster
Germany’s Nuclear Mistake (And What We’ve Learned)
Not rendering correctly? View this e-mail as a web page here.Editor’s note: AI is demanding unprecedented power… and the world is struggling to keep up.Considering the scale of the AI boom, we can’t afford to be picky. The U.S. is “all in” on plenty of energy options, both “dirty” and “clean.”But as Joel explains in today’s essay – first published on November 11 – one source in particular will be invaluable in an AI-driven world…Germany’s Nuclear Mistake (And What We’ve Learned)By Joel Litman, chief investment officer, Altimetry Germany lost its energy independence over a bottle of red wine…The reversal traces back to one evening in 2011. Chancellor Angela Merkel was winding down in her Berlin apartment… having a drink and discussing the Fukushima nuclear disaster with her husband.Earlier that year, a massive earthquake had triggered a tsunami that struck the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant. It caused three nuclear meltdowns within days.Merkel didn’t want a similar disaster to play out on her watch. Germany’s 17 reactors supplied nearly one-quarter of the nation’s electricity. But its relationship with nuclear power was tumultuous at best.Since the 1970s, protesters had been occupying construction sites and marching by the thousands against new reactors. Germany’s storage of U.S. nuclear weapons during the Cold War turned folks fearful. The Chernobyl meltdown in 1986 made matters worse.And Fukushima was the last straw.Merkel was facing elections and a restive Green movement…She saw an opportunity. Within days, she announced an accelerated nuclear exit that would only take about a decade. The policy sailed through parliament with overwhelming support.It was supposed to be an environmental win. The “Energiewende” promised to replace nuclear with vast networks of wind turbines and solar fields.But wind and solar only work when it’s… windy and sunny. Last year, the two could only cover 43% of all German energy output.And Germany still doesn’t have a great answer for keeping the lights on during a calm, cloudy day.To fill the gap, the country has turned back to coal and natural gas.It all came to a head just a few months ago…European Union companies have to purchase “carbon allowances” to match their carbon-dioxide emissions every year. The annual deadline to comply is September 30.That means if companies haven’t purchased enough allowances before then, they have to do so in September.And three months ago, much of Germany lacked clean energy. That extra demand sent “dirty” energy prices soaring… leaving the country in a pinch.Recommended Links:More Than 150 Stocks Could CRASH (Beginning Next Week)A controversial analyst whose work is followed by members of all 10 of the biggest investing firms in the world is now issuing a startling warning. Today, he says 50% of the 300-plus stocks that have doubled in 2025 look due for a CRASH in 2026, according to his system. In his latest investing briefing, he even names TWO of America’s most popular stocks that could suffer the most. Until tomorrow, get their names and tickers right here.Urgent Holiday Announcement From Doc This WeekDr. David “Doc” Eifrig has an urgent message about his position at Stansberry Research. In a new, short 10-minute update, he shares his (very rare and surprising) outlook for 2026… and an announcement that could shake up the entire financial-publishing industry. This could change how you make money next year… But you must see this before the holidays are over. Click here for Doc’s holiday update.German electricity prices hit €125.95 per megawatt-hour (“MWh”). France, which gets more than two-thirds of its power from nuclear, was paying just €13.86 per MWh.The contrast couldn’t have been starker. Nuclear-powered France remains largely insulated from fuel-price shocks and weather swings. Germany has found itself running coal plants and paying record carbon fees.Merkel hoped her plan would modernize Germany’s energy grid. Instead, it has set the country back decades.Here in the U.S., it seems we’ve learned that lesson already…We’re still working on plenty of natural gas and renewable-energy projects. But we aren’t slowing down on nuclear, either…The U.S. is at a crossroads. And the decision we make could determine whether we end up like Germany… or like France.That’s because, for the first time in decades, there simply isn’t enough power.Our energy grid is built to handle short periods of peak energy demand. For the rest of the year, the grid operates well below its maximum capacity.Peak demand has been effectively flat for the past two decades, averaging around 750 gigawatts (“GW”). Total capacity also stayed pretty stable, around 1,000 GW.That was, until 2021… when energy production ramped up following the pandemic.Said another way, peak demand only required 74% of our grid’s total capacity from 2005 to 2020… and it has required just 64% since then.But the rise of AI has triggered tremendous growth in demand for energy to power those advanced AI models…In 2023, data centers accounted for 4% of electricity used in the U.S. By 2030, they could use as much as 12% of our grid’s power.As a result, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission estimates peak energy demand will reach 947 GW by 2029.That’s a 26% jump for a metric that has largely been flat over the past 20 years.Said another way, demand could soon jump to 79% of total capacity. And that could result in an unprecedented energy crisis.Most industry experts agree that if we want to solve our growing need for power, we’ll need to support a new age of nuclear energy.Nuclear is cleaner than natural gas and coal. And it’s far more efficient than solar or wind. A single nuclear facility can produce the same amount of electricity as hundreds of wind turbines.Tomorrow, we’ll cover a specific type of nuclear reactor that’s gaining support in an energy-hungry world. With energy demand on the rise, the U.S. is rethinking its strategy. Nuclear is the best solution we have to meet our AI needs.And that’s creating a compelling investment opportunity in nuclear-related stocks.Regards,Joel LitmanDecember 30, 2025P.S. Nuclear stocks have plenty of momentum behind them. That makes them ideal candidates for our newest research service, Breakout Profits…Each month, we recommend a standout stock with strong AI-focused tailwinds. Our picks are up at least 100% since the launch of ChatGPT.And based on months of research, I’m confident they’re set to double again in the near future.I explain it all in a detailed presentation – including how to get 50% off a “Charter Membership,” plus thousands of dollars in free research and bonuses. Get the full story here.Tell us what you think of this contentWe value our subscribers’ feedback. To help us improve your experience, we’d like to ask you a couple brief questions.Click here to rate this e-mailA publication from  You have received this e-mail as part of your subscription to Altimetry Daily Authority. If you no longer want to receive e-mails from Altimetry Daily Authority, click here.Published by Altimetry.You’re receiving this e-mail at peter.hovis@gmail.com. For questions about your account or to speak with customer service, call (800) 701-9346 (U.S.), 9 a.m. – 5 p.m. Eastern time or e-mail info@altimetry.com. Please note: The law prohibits us from giving personalized financial advice.© 2025 Altimetry. All rights reserved. Any reproduction, copying, or redistribution, in whole or in part, is prohibited without written permission from Altimetry. 110 Cambridge Street, Cambridge, MA 02141. altimetry.com.Any brokers mentioned constitute a partial list of available brokers and is for your information only. Altimetry does not recommend or endorse any brokers, dealers, or investment advisors.Altimetry forbids its writers from having a financial interest in any security they recommend to our subscribers. All employees of Altimetry (and affiliated companies) must wait 24 hours after an investment recommendation is published online – or 72 hours after a direct mail publication is sent – before acting on that recommendation.This work is based on SEC filings, current events, interviews, corporate press releases, and what we’ve learned as financial journalists. It may contain errors, and you shouldn’t make any investment decision based solely on what you read here. It’s your money and your responsibility. |
