RJ Hamster
Elon just filed a shocking patent that could rock…

March 22, 2026
Elon just filed a shocking patent that could rock the world
BONUS: The Consumer Cliff Is Here — But the Best Short May Not Be the One Everyone Is Naming
A message from our friends at Banyan Hill Research (Sponsor)
Elon just filed a shocking patent that could rock the world
Dear Reader,
I just uncovered the craziest – and most astonishing – thing I’ve ever seen.
It’s a new Tesla patent that could rock the world.
In this new patent, Elon describes a new “keyhole surgery-like process” for powering technology.
Sounds bizarre – until you realize what it actually means.
It means Elon may have just solved the biggest problem facing America right now.
If I’m right, this breakthrough could ignite a $3 trillion industrial revolution – and make Elon Musk the most powerful man on the planet.
We got a clue when Tesla’s board offered Musk a $1 trillion contract… the biggest in corporate history.
Wall Street still hasn’t connected the dots.
April 22nd – I believe Elon will make this breakthrough public.
According to my research, a handful of tiny companies that I believe are tied to his secret project could skyrocket. The gains could be historic.
I’ve never seen anything like this in my 30 years in tech and finance.
I put the story together in a short video as fast as I could right here… so you could see it before the rest of the world does.
Regards,
Ian King
Chief Strategist, Strategic Fortunes
BONUS ARTICLE
After Lululemon’s Crash, Traders Are Hunting the Next Consumer Casualty
Every so often, the market rediscovers an old truth with dramatic flair:
A premium consumer stock can look invincible right up until the moment management admits growth is slowing, margins are under pressure, and the customer is no longer willing to pay up the way Wall Street assumed.
That was the message from Lululemon this week.
The company issued a 2026 outlook below expectations, warned of a roughly $380 million gross tariff impact, and revealed that fourth-quarter gross margin fell 550 basis points, including a 520-basis-point tariff hit. Reuters also noted the company is dealing with softer spending, a lack of design freshness, rising competition, and no permanent CEO in place.
That is how premium-multiple consumer stories break.
Not necessarily through a collapse in revenue.
But through the loss of the market’s faith that the brand still deserves a premium in the first place.
Lululemon’s current stock price tells you how far that reset has already gone. Shares are now around $162.82, giving the company a market cap of about $19.35 billion and a trailing P/E of roughly 11.3x. That is a very different stock from the one investors used to pay a luxury-like multiple for.
So now traders are asking the obvious next question:
Who is next?
And that is where the discussion becomes more interesting — and more dangerous.
Because the “consumer cliff” is real, but it is not hitting every company the same way.
What Lululemon Actually Taught the Market
The easy takeaway is that the consumer is weakening.
The more useful takeaway is more specific:
The market is no longer willing to forgive premium brands when growth slows, product momentum fades, and tariffs or promotions begin to erode the margin structure.
Look closely at Lululemon’s setup and the pattern is clear.
The company guided 2026 revenue to $11.35 billion to $11.50 billion, below the $11.52 billion analysts expected, and projected EPS of $12.10 to $12.30, below the $12.58 consensus. Reuters also reported that the company is trying to restore full-price sales growth in North America by increasing product newness, reducing SKUs, and rebalancing inventory — corporate language that usually means the assortment has lost some urgency and the merchandising machine needs repair.
That is not merely a macro problem.
That is a multiple-compression problem.
The market can tolerate soft consumers.
It has a harder time tolerating soft consumers and fading brand heat and rising costs at the same time.
Lululemon has also lost nearly two-thirds of its value over the past two years, according to Reuters, as design missteps and weaker brand freshness fed market-share losses. That is not a routine retail wobble. It is a reminder that once investors stop seeing a company as a category-defining growth asset, the re-rating can be brutal.
That is why the “retail apocalypse” theme is back.
But it should not be applied with a paint roller.
The Consumer Cliff Is Real — but It Is Uneven
This is not a world where every consumer-facing company is rolling over together.
Reuters has shown that some companies are clearly feeling pressure from strained discretionary spending and inflation-sensitive shoppers. At the same time, other premium brands are still producing real growth, especially if they have fresh product cycles, international expansion, and customers willing to absorb price increases.
That is the key distinction for traders.
A successful short in this environment is not “any expensive consumer name.”
It is a company with some combination of these traits:
- slowing North America demand,
- margin pressure from tariffs or promotion,
- a brand that may be peaking,
- consensus expectations still too high,
- and a valuation that has not yet fully reset.
Lululemon fit that profile almost perfectly before the selloff.
The harder question is whether Deckers, especially through the HOKA narrative, fits it now.
Is Deckers/HOKA Really the Next Great Short?
This is where I think traders need to be careful.
Yes, Deckers is a premium branded consumer company. Yes, HOKA has been one of the hottest footwear stories of the cycle. Yes, any market obsessed with “what breaks next” will naturally start circling recent winners.
But the latest actual operating data do not yet look like Lululemon’s. Not even close.
Deckers reported fiscal third-quarter 2026 revenue of $1.958 billion, up 7.1%, with diluted EPS up 11% to $3.33. HOKA brand sales rose 18.5% to $628.9 million, UGG sales rose 4.9%to $1.305 billion, DTC sales increased 8.1%, and international sales rose 15%. The company also raised full-year guidance, including HOKA growth to a mid-teens percent increase and full-year EPS to $6.80–$6.85.
That is not the profile of a consumer company driving toward the edge of a cliff.
That is the profile of one still executing.
Even Reuters’ January report, which acknowledged macro volatility and strained discretionary spending, still described Deckers as benefiting from strong demand, new product innovation, increased promotions, and full-price selling, with shares up about 15% after the report.
And then there is valuation.
Deckers now trades around $100.43 with a market cap of roughly $15.1 billion and a P/E of about 14.5x. That is not screamingly expensive. In fact, after prior drawdowns, it is much less of a premium-multiple consumer stock than the narrative around HOKA’s popularity might suggest.
So if the trade idea is “short the next high-multiple consumer darling,” Deckers may no longer fit the cleanest version of that setup.
Could it still fall if the entire market derates consumer discretionary again? Of course.
But a good short usually requires more than broad anxiety. It requires fragile fundamentals plus fragile expectations.
Right now, Deckers has neither in the way Lululemon did.
What Traders May Be Missing About HOKA
The HOKA debate is really a debate about duration.
The short thesis says:
HOKA is a fashion-heavy running brand that has enjoyed a spectacular adoption curve, but all hot footwear brands eventually cool, and once growth decelerates, the market will punish the parent company.
That is not crazy.
But you have to compare it with the numbers you actually have, not the numbers you fear might arrive later.
At the moment, HOKA is still posting high-teens growth, helped push Deckers’ quarter past expectations, and remains part of a business generating healthy full-price selling and strong cash return capacity — including a share repurchase expectation of more than $1.0 billionthis fiscal year.
In other words, HOKA may eventually become shortable.
But that is different from saying it is the best short now.
The smarter way to watch Deckers is to monitor for the first meaningful signs of deterioration:
- HOKA growth slipping from high teens toward single digits,
- DTC momentum rolling over,
- heavier promotions becoming necessary,
- U.S. growth turning negative,
- or management guiding more cautiously than current numbers justify.
Without those signals, the short is mostly a bet that “a good story has gone on too long.”
Sometimes that works.
Often it is expensive.
If Not Deckers, Then Where Is the Risk?
The better hunting ground may be in names where the premium remains high and the growth narrative is already beginning to wobble.
One example is On Holding.
Reuters reported that On expects 23% annual sales growth in 2026, down from 30% in 2025, and the stock still dropped as much as 14% even though fourth-quarter sales rose 22.6% and adjusted EBITDA increased 31.8%. The company expects gross margin of at least 63% and says its premium positioning remains intact.
That is an important clue.
When a company delivers strong reported numbers but the stock still sells off on a slowdown from 30% to 23% growth, the market is telling you expectations remain demanding. That is how a premium-multiple consumer name becomes vulnerable even before the operating business truly breaks.
Nike, by contrast, is a different case. It is still dealing with brand and growth issues, but its current valuation — around 39.5x earnings per the finance snapshot — reflects a very different setup from the newer premium-growth names, and its problem is already well known to the market.
Lululemon, meanwhile, looks less like the next short and more like the stock that already wasthe short. At around 11.3x earnings, much of the multiple damage has already happened, even if the business still has operational problems to solve.
That leaves traders with a more nuanced conclusion:
The next big downside move in consumer may not come from the most famous damaged brand.
It may come from the still-beloved premium grower that starts missing by just enough to crack the illusion.
The Macro Backdrop Makes This More Dangerous
There is another reason this theme matters now.
Reuters recently argued that “the lost art of short selling” may be coming back as investors begin questioning frothy valuations more broadly. The piece pointed to signs that optimism in high-flying sectors is being tested and warned that informed skeptics can help drag prices back toward real
That matters for consumer stocks because the macro backdrop is no longer especially forgiving.
Tariffs are biting.
Inflation has not disappeared.
Consumer confidence has wobbled.
And even affluent shoppers are becoming more selective about where they spend.
Lululemon’s report explicitly reflected tariff pressure and softer demand across cohorts, while Reuters’ coverage of other consumer companies this year has shown price resistance and more value-seeking behavior even in categories once thought more resili
So the next leg down in consumer is unlikely to be caused by one bad quarter alone.
It will come from the intersection of weaker demand, weaker pricing power, and weaker investor patience.
That is exactly the sort of setup short sellers look for.
My Read on the Trade
If you force me to rank the setup, I would frame it this way:
Lululemon taught the market what a premium consumer de-rating looks like when the story cracks. But after the damage, it is no longer the cleanest sh
Deckers/HOKA is the name people want to target because it is visible, premium, and fashionable. But the latest numbers still show strength: 7.1% total revenue growth, 18.5%HOKA growth, 11% EPS growth, and raised guidance. That makes it a dangerous short unless the next data point changes materia
The more interesting vulnerability is in any premium consumer stock where investors are still paying for durability and acceleration — and where even a modest slowdown could trigger a Lululemon-style multiple reset. On is one example worth monitoring because the market already showed sensitivity to decelerating growth despite strong operating resu
So the “consumer cliff” is real.
But the opportunity is not to short every brand with a nice logo and a premium price point.
It is to identify where expectations are still high enough to break.
Bottom Line
This week’s lesson is simple:
The market has stopped giving premium consumer brands the benefit of the doubt.
Lululemon’s selloff was not just about one weak forecast. It was about the death of easy assumptions — that high-income shoppers would remain resilient, that full-price demand would hold, and that premium brands would always deserve premium multip
But that does not automatically make Deckers the next Lululemon.
For now, Deckers still has growth, still has guidance momentum, and no longer has the sort of extravagant valuation that makes a short effortl
The better trade may be to stay selective and wait for the next premium consumer stock where the fundamentals start slipping before the multiple has reset.
That is where the real money tends to be made.
Disclaimer: This editorial is for informational purposes only and should not be considered investment advice. Always conduct independent research before making financial decisions.
IMPORTANT NOTICE AND DISCLAIMER
Investing Media Solutions, LLC (“IMS”), the owner of this website (the “Website”), cannot guarantee the accuracy or completeness of the information contained in any article, email, newsletter, or other publication posted on or viewed in connection with this website (the “Publications”). The author or authors of those Publications are solely responsible for their contents. IMS has not done any research or due diligence into the markets, industries, or companies which may appear or be mentioned in the Publications. IMS will NOT be liable for any loss or damage caused by a reader’s reliance on information posted on the Website or contained in the Publications.
FOR EDUCATIONAL AND INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY; NOT INVESTMENT ADVICE.
This Website and the Publications are for educational and informational purposes only. This Website and the Publications do not purport to be a complete analysis of any company’s financial position. This Website, the Publications or any statements made in the Publications are not, and should not be construed to be, personalized investment advice directed to or appropriate for any particular individual. This Website or the statements made in the Publications should NOT be relied upon for purposes of transacting in any securities posted on the Website or mentioned in the Publications, nor should they be construed as a personalized recommendation to you to buy, sell, or hold any position in any security posted on this Website or mentioned in any Publications.
SUBSTANTIAL RISK IN INVESTMENT.
Any individual who chooses to invest in any securities including those mentioned in the Publications should do so with caution. Investing or transacting in securities involves substantial risk; you may lose some, all, or possibly more than your original investment. Readers bear responsibility for their own investment research and decisions and should review all investment decisions with a licensed or registered investment professional.
NOT AN INVESTMENT ADVISOR OR REGISTERED BROKER
Neither IMS nor any of its respective owners or employees are registered or licensed as a securities broker-dealer, broker, an investment advisor, or an investment advisor representative with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), any state securities regulatory authority, or any self-regulatory organization.
To more fully understand our Website, please review our full disclaimer located at: https://thecheapinvestor.com/disclaimer/
At The Cheap Investor, it’s our mission to create and provide a community that helps you invest and understand stocks. When TheCheapInvestor was established, we wanted to make the community an inclusive place where investors can come to get ahead! Not just help them with daily stock picks. The Cheap Investor are provided to you for information only and should not be considered as a stock or investment advisor. The Cheap Investor may make available certain information related to trading strategies and stock prices for educational and information purposes only; any information made available should not be construed as an endorsement, recommendation, or sponsorship of any company or security. By visiting this site or using the training materials, you acknowledge and agree that any reliance upon the content or data available through The Cheap Investor is at your own sole risk. You are strongly advised to use your own judgment, research, and consult a professional advisor.
Over the years, and with thousands of followers that use our stock picks daily, we promise to always aim to get better at what we do every single day! In addition, our primary focus is on our communication with you. It’s really important to us that every time you come to us, you end up leaving with the help you came for to take your investment portfolio to new levels.
We particularly appreciate when our following provides feedback via testimonials, reviews, and comments left on our site or social media accounts. Because with that feedback, we can use it to make your next visit to our site even better than the last!
Since we put so much effort into the relationship with you, we hope that any investment in us is exactly the way you hoped it would be. Because by choosing to go with https://TheCheapInvestor.com/, it’s our promise that we provide a community you will come back to over and over again.
Now, as much as we care about making investors more successful, we also care about your privacy. TheCheapInvestor is owned and operated by TheCheapInvestor website.
We’re committed to the right to your privacy and strive to provide a safe and secure user experience. Our Privacy Policy explains how we collect, store and use personal information, provided by you on our website.
What Information Do We Collect?
When you visit our Web site you may provide us with two types of information: personal information you knowingly choose to disclose that is collected on an individual basis and Web site use information collected on an aggregate basis as you and others browse our Web site.
For example, you may need to provide the following information: • Name • Website URL information • Email address • Home and business phone number
In addition to providing the foregoing information, if you choose to correspond further with us through email, we may retain the content of your email messages together with your email address and our responses. We provide the same protections for these electronic communications that we employ in the maintenance of information received by mail and telephone. It also explains important information that ensures we won’t abuse the information that you provide to us in good faith. By accessing and using our website, you can trust that what you want to be kept private, will be kept private. If at any time, you would like to read our Privacy Policy and get a better understanding of your rights and liabilities under the law.
Feel free to visit our site, find the privacy policy in the footer and read it. If there is something you are concerned about or wish to get more clarity on, please let us know by contacting us at support@thecheapinvestor.com. The Privacy Policy also informs you of how to notify us to stop using your personal information. If you wish to view our official policies, please visit our website https://TheCheapInvestor.com/
At The Cheap Investor, we are strongly committed to protecting your privacy and providing a safe & high-quality online experience for all of our visitors. We understand that you care about how the information you provide to us is used and shared. We have developed a Privacy Policy to inform you of our policies regarding the collection, use, and disclosure of information we receive from users of our website. The Cheap Investor operates the Website.
Our Privacy Policy, along with our Term & Conditions, governs your use of this site. By using https://TheCheapInvestor/, or by accepting the Terms of Use (via opt-in, checkbox, pop-up, or clicking an email link confirming the same), you agree to be bound by our Terms & Conditions and our Privacy Policy. If you have provided personal, billing, or other voluntarily provided information, you may access, review, and make changes to it via instructions found on the Website or by emailing us at support@thecheapinvestor.com. To manage your receipt of marketing and non-transactional communications, you may unsubscribe by clicking the “unsubscribe” link located on the bottom of any marketing email. Emails related to the purchase or delivery of orders are provided automatically – Customers are not able to opt out of transactional emails. We will try to accommodate any requests related to the management of Personal Information in a timely manner. However, it is not always possible to completely remove or modify information in our databases (for example, if we have a legal obligation to keep it for certain timeframes, for example). If you have any questions, simply reply to this email or visit our website to view our official policies.
Update your email preferences or unsubscribe here
© 2026 The Cheap Investor
203 N La Salle Suite 2100
Chicago , Illinois 60601, United StatesPowered by beehiivTerms of Service